Agenda of Council - 23 November 2016

Ethical Decision Making and Conflicts of Interest

A guiding checklist for Councillors, officers and community committees

Ethical decision making

· Is the decision or conduct legal?

· Is it consistent with Government policy, Council’s objectives and Code of Conduct?

· What will the outcome be for you, your colleagues, the Council, anyone else?

· Does it raise a conflict of interest?

· Do you stand to gain personally at public expense?

· Can the decision be justified in terms of public interest?

· Would it withstand public scrutiny?

Conflict of interest

A conflict of interest is a clash between private interest and public duty. There are two types of conflict:

· Pecuniary – regulated by the Local Government Act 1993 and Office of Local Government

· Non-pecuniary – regulated by Codes of Conduct and policy. ICAC, Ombudsman, Office of Local Government (advice only). If declaring a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest, Councillors can choose to either disclose and vote, disclose and not vote or leave the Chamber.

The test for conflict of interest

· Is it likely I could be influenced by personal interest in carrying out my public duty?

· Would a fair and reasonable person believe I could be so influenced?

· Conflict of interest is closely tied to the layperson’s definition of ‘corruption’ – using public office for private gain.

· Important to consider public perceptions of whether you have a conflict of interest.

Identifying problems

1st Do I have private interests affected by a matter I am officially involved in?

2nd Is my official role one of influence or perceived influence over the matter?

3rd Do my private interests conflict with my official role?

Whilst seeking advice is generally useful, the ultimate decision rests with the person concerned.

Agency advice

Officers of the following agencies are available during office hours to discuss the obligations placed on Councillors, officers and community committee members by various pieces of legislation, regulation and codes.

Contact	Phone	Email	Website
Bega Valley Shire Council	(02) 6499 2222	council@begavalley.nsw.gov.au	www.begavalley.nsw.gov.au
ICAC	8281 5999 Toll Free 1800 463 909	icac@icac.nsw.gov.au	www.icac.nsw.gov.au
Office of Local Government	(02) 4428 4100	olg@olg.nsw.gov.au	http://www.olg.nsw.gov.au/
NSW Ombudsman	(02) 8286 1000 Toll Free 1800 451 524	nswombo@ombo.nsw.gov.au	www.ombo.nsw.gov.au

TO: The General Manager
Bega Valley Shire Council

Disclosure of pecuniary interests / non-pecuniary conflict of interests

In accordance with the Council’s Code of Meeting Practice and the requirements of the Local Government Act 1993 and regulations or dispensation issued by the Office of Local Government I hereby disclose the following pecuniary interests and/or non-pecuniary conflict of interests at the meeting as indicated below:

Ordinary meeting held on _____ / _____ / 20___

dd mm yy

Item no & subject
Interest (tick one)	Pecuniary interest Non-pecuniary conflict of interest
* Nature of interest
If Non-pecuniary (tick one)	Disclose & vote Disclose & not vote Leave chamber

Item no & subject
Interest (tick one)	Pecuniary interest Non-pecuniary conflict of interest
* Nature of interest
If Non-pecuniary (tick one)	Disclose & vote Disclose & not vote Leave chamber

Signed
Print Name

* Note: Under the provisions of Section 451(1) of the Local Government Act 1993 (pecuniary interests) and Part 4 of the Model Code of Conduct prescribed by the Local Government (Discipline) Regulation (conflict of interests) it is necessary for you to disclose the nature of the interest when making a disclosure of a pecuniary interest or a non-pecuniary conflict of interest at a meeting.

Council

23 November 2016

Agenda

Statement of Commencement of Live Streaming

Acknowledgement of Traditional Owners of Bega Valley Shire

1 Apologies and requests for leave of absence

2 Confirmation Of Minutes

Recommendation

That the Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting held on 2 November 2016 as circulated, be taken as read and confirmed.

3 Declarations

Pecuniary, Non-Pecuniary and Political Donation Disclosures to be declared and tabled.

4 Deputations (by prior arrangement)

5 Petitions

6 Mayoral Minutes

6.1 White Ribbon Day - 25 November 2016....................................................................................... 9

7 Urgent Business

8 Adjournment to Standing Committees

Recommendation

That the Ordinary meeting of the Council be adjourned for the purpose of dealing with staff reports to Standing Committees.

9 Staff Reports – Planning and Environment (Sustainability)

In accordance with Council’s Code of Meeting Practice, this section of the agenda will be chaired by Cr Seckold.

Nil Reports

10 Staff Reports – Community, Culture and Leisure (Liveability)

In accordance with Council’s Code of Meeting Practice , this section of the agenda will be chaired by Cr Griff.

10.1 S355 Cemetery Committee Review............................................................................................. 12

11 Staff Reports –Economic Development and Business Growth (Enterprising)

In accordance with Council’s Code of Meeting Practice, this section of the agenda will be chaired by Cr Nadin.

Nil Reports

12 Staff Reports – Infrastructure Waste and Water (Accessibility)

In accordance with Council’s Code of Meeting Practice, this section of the agenda will be chaired by Cr Fitzpatrick.

12.1 Naming of a laneway in Tathra and road in Eden...................................................................... 38

12.2 Pretty Point Bridge Truss Replacement...................................................................................... 45

12.3 Revitalisation of Bega Valley Shire Floodplain Risk Management Focus Group................... 78

12.4 Bermagui Men's Shed proposal to lease part of Old Bermagui Landfill Site...................... 113

12.5 Bega Valley Local Traffic Committee......................................................................................... 121

13 Staff Reports – Governance and Strategy (Leading Organisation)

In accordance with Council’s Code of Meeting Practice, this section of the agenda will be chaired by Cr Tapscot

13.1 Internal Audit Committee Annual Report................................................................................ 124

13.2 Formation of Future Planning Focus Groups........................................................................... 147

13.3 Actions from resolutions of Council - Status Report.............................................................. 150

13.4 2015 - 16 Annual Report............................................................................................................ 169

14 Staff Reports – Finance (Leading Organisation)

In accordance with Council’s Code of Meeting Practice, this section of the agenda will be chaired by Cr Bain

14.1 Presentation of Audited Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2016............ 174

14.2 Quarterly Budget Review Statement (QBRS) at September 2016....................................... 182

15 Adoption of Reports from Standing Committees

Recommendation

That all motions recorded in the Standing Committees, including votes for and against, and acknowledging declarations of interest already made, be adopted in by the Ordinary Council meeting.

16 Delegates Reports

16.1 Local Government NSW Annual Conference 2016................................................................ 213

17 Rescission/alteration Motions

18 Notices of Motion

18.1 East West transport corridor - Imlay Road............................................................................... 216

18.2 Littleton Gardens Toilets............................................................................................................. 217

18.3 Works on Land purchased by Council at 77 - 79 Auckland Street, Bega........................... 218

18.4 Eden Pool heating........................................................................................................................ 219

19 Questions On Notice

19.1 Aquatic Facilities Review update............................................................................................... 221

20 Questions for the Next Meeting

21 Confidential Business

Representations by members of the public regarding closure of part of meeting

Adjournment Into Closed Session, exclusion of the media and public......................... 222

21.1 Sewerage Treatment Plant Operational Options

This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (d) of the Local Government act 1993 as the report contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret.

21.2 Bega Land Matters

This report is confidential in accordance with section 10A (2) (c) of the Local Government act 1993 as the report contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.

Statement of Cessation of Live Streaming for the period of the Closed Session.

Statement of Re-Commencement of Live Streaming

22 Adoption of reports from Closed Session

23 Resolutions to declassify reports considered in closed session

Council 23 November 2016

Item 6.1

6.1. White Ribbon Day - 25 November 2016

Mayor Cr McBain

Background

November 25 2016 is White Ribbon Day. It is the world’s largest movement of men and boys working to end men’s violence against women and girls, promote gender equality, healthy relationships and a new vision of masculinity.

The White Ribbon website explains the origins of the White Ribbon movement:

“On the afternoon of 6 December 1989, a man walked into the École Polytechnique University in Montreal and massacred 14 of his female classmates. His actions traumatised a nation and brought the issue of violence against women to the forefront of our collective consciousness.

Two years later, a group of men in Toronto decided they had a responsibility to speak out about and work to stop men’s violence against women. As a result, the White Ribbon Campaign in Canada became an annual awareness-raising event, held between 25 November and 6 December.

In 1999, the United Nations General Assembly declared 25 November as the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women, with a white ribbon as its iconic symbol.” ¹

White Ribbon Day is part of a broader campaign of 16 days of Activism Against Gender Violence.

Definition

Put simply, and using an internationally recognised definition: Violence against women is any act of gender based violence that causes or could cause physical, sexual or psychological harm or suffering to women, including threats of harm or coercion, in public or in private life.

As this definition makes clear, violence against women is not only or always physical. It includes psychological, economic, emotional and sexual violence and abuse, and a wide range of controlling, coercive and intimidating behaviours.

In Australia, violence against women is called many different things, including domestic violence, family violence, intimate partner violence, sexual harassment and sexual assault. ⁴

Statistics

Intimate partner violence is the most common type of violence against women, affecting 30 per cent of women worldwide, according to the 2013 World Health Organization report. Violence against women and girls is a major issue in Australian society. ³

One Australian study found intimate partner violence was the leading contributor to death, disability and illness in Victorian women aged 15 to 44 (VicHealth 2004).³

Worryingly, 1 in 3 women in Australia have experienced physical violence and 1 in 5 Australian women have experienced sexual violence. ⁵

Despite all the work done and awareness that has been raised, sadly, one woman still per week is dead because of family violence. ⁴

Local action

A Public Forum will be held in the Council Chamber on Wednesday 23 November 2016 at Bega Valley Commemorative Civic Centre to raise awareness and will include presentations from Council’s Brighter Futures, South East Women and Children’s Service (SEWACS) and the Staying Home Leaving Violence Program.

Locally the Women’s Resource Centre in Bega convenes the Bega Domestic and Sexual Violence Committee meetings that operate to increase community awareness of domestic violence issues and to help prevent violence against women, children and families. The committee is made up of a number of service providers. One key strategy is the town entry sign message 'Bega Valley Says No to Violence'.

The Committee aims to:

· Raise local community awareness of the unacceptability and criminality of domestic violence.

· Enhance interagency responses to women and children who are victims of domestic violence

· Address issues of violence against all women in our community including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander, women from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds, younger women, older women, lesbians and women with disabilities.

If you, or someone you know, is experiencing domestic violence you can ring the Domestic Violence Line for help on 1800 656 463 (TTY 1800 671 442). The Domestic Violence Line is a state-wide free-call number and is available 24 hours, seven days a week. ³

Attachments

Nil

Recommendation

1. That Council acknowledge the importance of a shared approach to tackling family violence and acknowledge that everyone has a role to play.

2. That Councillors show their support through the following pledge:

“I will stand up, speak out and act to prevent men's violence against women.”

References/Sources:

1. http://www.whiteribbon.org.au accessed 9 November 2016.

3. http://www.womensresourcecentre.org/domestic-violence-committee accessed 9 November 2016

3. http://www.domesticviolence.com.au/pages/impact-of-domestic-violence-on-women.php accessed 9 November 2016

4. http://www.ourwatch.org.au/ accessed 9 November 2016

5. ANROWS – Australian National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety. www.anrows.org.au

Council 23 November 2016

Item 10.1

10.1. S355 Cemetery Committee Review

A review of the function of the S355 Cemetery Committee has been undertaken; recommendations are presented for Council’s consideration.

Director Community, Relations and Leisure

Background

Bega Valley Shire Council is responsible for 13 cemeteries across the Shire from Bermagui in the North to Wonboyn in the South.

In 1995 Council delegated the management of the cemeteries to individual community committees, who at the time were responsible for the day to day management and operations of the cemeteries. A Section 355 General Cemetery Committee (under the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) (the Act) provisions) was formed with representation from each of the cemetery committees.

A comprehensive Cemetery Review was undertaken of the management of Council's cemeteries in 2007 including independent reviews of the operations of the cemeteries.

A number of recommendations regarding cemetery operations were adopted by Council in 2009 including the internal management of all cemetery operations aimed at mitigating risk in the areas of Work Health and Safety, contract management, financial accountability and burial record keeping. The report from 18 August 2009 is attached.

The committees, at the time, were given the choice of staying on to assist Council in the transition and implementation of the recommendations from the report. The shift in responsibilities for these committees has seen the number of individual cemetery committees reduced to five active committees. The remainder of the committees chose to step away from the formal committee structure for a number of reasons, predominantly the shift of responsibility to Council officers for day to day operations and management of the cemeteries.

Since 2009 the existing cemetery committee members have undertaken a range of voluntary work in the cemeteries, particularly in Eden and Bermagui, and have attended quarterly General Cemetery Committee meetings to discuss individual cemetery issues and provide feedback on broader cemetery issues across the Shire.

The current committee structure is a Section 355 General Committee with individual committees represented via the S355 Committee. This is the structure that was in place prior to the Review and has left both the S355 Committee and the remaining individual cemetery committees, operating somewhere between the former committee structure and filling a broader advisory role.

Currently what remains is an amalgam of functions with individual cemetery committees having different levels of involvement in the maintenance of cemeteries across the spectrum from undertaking the majority of maintenance, to undertaking some maintenance or undertaking no maintenance responsibilities.

The S355 Committee, due to the small number of individual committees, is not truly representative of all cemeteries and there is an understandable tendency to advocate for specific cemeteries.

Volunteering

The value of volunteering in our cemeteries in relation to maintenance and upkeep cannot be undervalued. There are a number of arrangements in place where community members volunteer their time towards the maintenance of the cemeteries. These arrangements can add significantly to the special sense of place in the cemetery, the look of the cemeteries and provides the local communities an opportunity to be involved in their cemetery. Some examples of these arrangements include;

-An individual cemetery committee meeting each week to undertake all aspects of
cemetery maintenance.

-Individual community members undertaking specific maintenance tasks in a cemetery

-Community groups undertaking project work

-Service Clubs undertaking the maintenance of a cemetery as a community service project

-Work for the dole and volunteer obligation arrangements.

Volunteering in Council's cemeteries can occur irrespective of any committee structure adopted, it is important to separate these volunteering functions from any future committee structure.

Council will continue to investigate volunteering options in all our cemeteries.

Proposed way forward

Given the overall responsibility of cemetery management, this should remain an internal function that will be the responsibility of Council officers and the role of volunteering on the maintenance, upkeep and beautification of cemeteries can be dealt with separately, as described above.

Proposed Section 355 Cemetery Advisory Committee

In a number of areas, Council has adopted the advisory committee approach (for example the Access Advisory Committee).

So that Council effectively continues to engage and receive input from the communities on the management of cemeteries, it is proposed that a S355 Committee, drawn from the across the community, be established with the following functions:

· Recommendation and advice on the overall management of Council’s cemeteries;

· Advocacy on behalf of all cemeteries as opposed to representing individual cemeteries; and

· Input into the strategic direction of Council’s cemeteries.

Under this model, individual cemetery committees would be dissolved (volunteering options would still be implemented as outlined above).

Membership of the advisory committee would be sought from a range of people that could bring a mix of skills and experience.

Issues

Legal

The Section 355 Cemetery Advisory Committee would be formed under S355 of the Local Government Act in line with Council’s other S355 committees.

Strategic

Policy

Draft S355 Cemetery Advisory Committee Guidelines have been developed and are attached for consideration.

Operational Plan

The cemetery management function is the responsibility of the Community Culture and Information Section and is captured in annual work plans for the Community Development team.

Asset

A Cemetery Asset Management Plan (CAMP) is under development and individual cemetery Facility Management Plans which will inform the CAMP, are in place to establish levels of service for each cemetery and to identify future works within existing budgets.

Social / Cultural

Cemeteries play a significant role in our communities. They are places that bring the community together, often when they are at their most vulnerable, through laying to rest and remembering their family members.

The cemeteries are also important historical records of the people of our Shire and an important resource from a local history and genealogy perspective.

Cemeteries also act as potential tourism sites. There is a growing movement in developing cemetery tours in areas around Australia.

Consultation

The current committee members were consulted over a number of months as to the best way forward to clarify the role for the committee and the cemeteries moving forward. They were unanimous in their support for the advisory model outlined above.

This model would not preclude further consultation at the local community level, on an annual or biennial basis, to seek feedback on the management of any specific cemetery, future development and any changes proposed.

Financial and Resources

There are no budgetary impacts in the establishment of the advisory committee model. Support for a general cemetery committee is identified as part of the Community Development team's annual work plans and budgets.

Conclusion

Cemeteries are a significant community asset. It is important Council has a formal process in place to seek feedback on the future direction of its cemeteries. The S355 Cemetery Advisory Committee is an effective way of seeking that input from the community and allowing the community to have their say.

Attachments

1 . Cemetery Advisory Committee Guidelines - Draft 2016

2 . Corporate Management Committee Cemetery Review - August 2009

Recommendation

1. That the reported be noted.

2. That Council adopt the S355 Cemetery Advisory Committee Model.

3. That Council endorse the S355 Cemetery Advisory Committee Guidelines.

4. That Council officers conduct a nomination process for membership to the Committee and report those nominations to Council.

5. That Council formally thank past members of cemetery committees for their significant contribution.

Council 23 November 2016

Item 12.1

12.1. Naming of a laneway in Tathra and road in Eden

The purpose of this report is to detail the outcome of the Public Exhibition process recently conducted regarding the proposal to name a laneway in Tathra and a road in Eden.

Director Transport and Utilities

Background

The New South Wales Address Policy applies to all roads in New South Wales (NSW), regardless of custodianship and maintenance agreements. The Policy indicates that all roads in NSW shall be authoritatively named and the names Gazetted. Road naming is legislated under the Roads Act 1993. This Act empowers the authority in charge of the road with the rights to name it.

Council officers have been progressively naming the unnamed roads and laneways within the Shire to abide by the Policy.

Laneway in Tathra

Council officers commenced the process to name a previously unnamed laneway in Tathra, situated between Illoura Street and Kianinny Street, as ‘Dhurga Lane’. The name proposed was on a pre-approved list of road names available for use by Council (approved on 3 February 2016) and in line with the Council’s Policy to adopt road names based on Aboriginal themes.

Named after the Aboriginal language of the south east coast, ‘Dhurga’ was proposed as it is situated between two other Aboriginal-themed road names.

The name also had the approval of the Geographical Names Board and the Local Aboriginal Land Council for use in that location.

Letters were sent to twenty-six (26) adjoining properties to the laneway, and a public submission advertising ‘Dhurga Lane’, was conducted, with one submission being received. The submission opposing the name ‘Dhurga Lane’ from Mick Tarlinton, indicated the following basis for the objection:

· The name ‘Dhurga’, being a language, doesn’t identify with the area as well as other Aboriginal names that were on the pre-approved list of road names;

· The name ‘Dhurga’ is difficult to pronounce;

· His preferred name for the lane was Waddy (Aboriginal word for ‘the sea’) or Yan (Aboriginal word for ‘fish’).

Staff Comment: The name ‘Dhurga Lane’ is appropriate for the lane situated in the vicinity of other Aboriginal-themed road names. In regards to the difficulty of pronunciation, Section 6.7.2 (b) of the Addressing Principles within the NSW Addressing Manual indicates:

“Road names shall be easy to pronounce, spell and write, and preferably not exceed three words (including the road type) or 25 characters. An exception to this is in the use of Aboriginal names when it is accepted that a traditional name may at first appear to be complex but will, over time, become more familiar and accepted by the community.” (Source Page 93)

Road in Eden

Council officers commenced a process to name a previously unnamed road in the Palestine area of Eden, extending north-west from the Princes Highway, as ‘Sabina Way’. The proposed name was chosen by one of the residents along the road in question, from five road names that were on a pre-approved list of road names specifically for the Eden area. Sabina Pike (1861 – 1946), was an important and influential Eden resident known particularly for building the Hotel Australasia at the turn of the twentieth century.

Two submissions were received, opposing the name ‘Sabina Way’. Details of the submissions are as follows:

Horton Submission

· That the only name available to Council on the pre-approved list that specifically relates to the Palestine area where the road is located, is ‘Bertha’; and therefore the road name should be Bertha Way, not Sabina Way.

Walker Submission

· The name ‘Bertha’ is more applicable to the Palestine area than ‘Sabina’;

· Was unaware of the significance of Sabina.

Council officers had also received information the name ‘Sabina Way’ may be more appropriately used in the redevelopment of the Hotel Australasia at some point in the future.

Given the two submissions opposing the name ‘Sabina’ and recommending the name ‘Bertha’, Council staff commenced a second process to name the road ‘Bertha Way’. ‘Bertha’ was also on a pre-approved list of road names available for use by Council and in line with the Council’s policy to adopt road names based on pioneers, settlers, and historical figures. Bertha Williams, who passed away in 1960, was instrumental in establishing the Palestine Public School.

One submission was received from Ron and Lorraine Cunning opposing the name ‘Bertha’. The Cunnings reside on the road in question.

The basis of their opposition to the name was:

· The name ‘Bertha’ has bad history and memories for them.

· The name was causing them stress and lack of sleep.

· Three alternative names were suggested in consultation with neighbours: Little Bellbird Rise, Lorikeet Lane and Ironbark Way.

Staff Comment: As there are already road names within the Local Government Area with the names ‘Bellbird’ and ‘Lorikeet’, these names would be unlikely to be approved by the Geographical Names Board of NSW. The third name proposed, Ironbark Way, meets the addressing guidelines and has been approved by the Geographical Names Board of NSW; however, is not on the list of pre-approved road names available for use by Council and therefore requires Council approval.

Council officers would like to commence a third process to name the road ‘Ironbark Way’. Consultation has occurred with the two residents who have direct access from the road, as well as with the two persons who submitted the original submissions opposing Sabina Way (Horton and Walker). All have agreed Ironbark Way would be an appropriate name for the proposed road.

It is recommended Council approve the name ‘Ironbark’ for the proposed road name and that Council officers complete the process, allowing a 14 day public exhibition period to formalise the matter.

Financial and Resources

Council has incurred advertising costs to name the two roads in question, however if Council choose to uphold the objections, further advertisement fees will be required. Property staff will be required to complete the formal road naming process and arrange street signage.

Conclusion

Dhurga Lane, Tathra: one submission was received from twenty-six letters sent to adjoining neighbours and advertisement in local newspapers, notifying of the intent to name the laneway Dhurga Lane. Council officers believe the lane is appropriately named in the vicinity of other Aboriginal-themed road names.

Sabina Way / Bertha Way / Ironbark Way, Eden: Given the potential to use ‘Sabina Way’ in some way with the redevelopment of the Hotel Australasia, as well as the concerns the name ‘Bertha Way’ is causing for one particular resident, it is recommended the road be named Ironbark Way with a 14 day public submission process to be commenced.

Attachments

1. Tarlinton submission opposing proposed road name Dhurga Lane Tathra 20160907

2. Horton submission opposing proposed road name Sabina Way Eden 20160823

3 . Walker submission opposing proposed road name Sabina Way Eden 20160907

4 . Cunning submission opposing proposed road name Bertha Way Eden 20161004

Recommendation

1. That Council approve the name ‘Dhurga Lane’ for an unnamed laneway that extends between Illoura Street and Kianinny Street in Tathra.

2. That Council uphold the objections received regarding Sabina Way and Bertha Way and resolve to readvertise and notify affected properties of the proposal to name the road that extends north west off the Princes Highway in Eden as ‘Ironbark Way’.

Council 23 November 2016

Item 12.2

12.2. Pretty Point Bridge Truss Replacement

The Pretty Point Bridge over Mataganah Creek on New Buildings Road (New Buildings/Rocky Hall area) is being replaced. The replacement of the trusses is unaffordable, given the current demands on infrastructure.

Director Transport and Utilities

Background

A report was presented to Council on 16 October 2013, which was subsequently deferred. A further report was prepared for Council on 6 November 2013, including heritage advice. A copy of the report and Timber Bridge Heritage Assessment dated April 2009 are both attached for further information.

As stated in the previous report ‘While it would be good to preserve the Pretty Point Bridge as a timber structure, the cost to do so is beyond Council’s resources and will commit Council to significant ongoing maintenance costs. If the bridge was to be retained in its original configuration, there would be an increasing need to bring in personnel skilled in truss maintenance, if they are available. Another difficulty is sourcing the timber in the required size and quality. The bottom cord of the Pretty Point Bridge has been reinforced with steel channels, as the required timber was not available at the time of the repairs. If the bridge was returned to a totally timber structure, it would always require a load limit of approximately 16 tonnes.’

Issues

Strategic

The bridge is located on a Council collector road and provides a vital link for the New Buildings, and Rocky Hall communities.

Asset

The Pretty Point Bridge is programmed as part of a staged renewal in the current financial year. The results of analysis by Council officers and a consulting engineer confirmed the truss was required to be removed with the intention of being replaced.

The replacement of the timber trusses for aesthetic purposes is proving to be difficult for the consulting engineer to design and will also be an added cost burden to the capital project. There will be ongoing timber maintenance costs associated with the timber trusses if they were to be replaced. Council currently has many timber structures that are costly to maintain.

Social / Cultural

The Pretty Point Bridge is listed as a Heritage item in Schedule 5 of the Bega Valley Local Environmental Plan 2013 (BVLEP). The reinstallation of the restored timber trusses as a freestanding, non-loadbearing structure either side of the Unibridge will address the Heritage issues of replacing the bridge with a modern structure. However, the ongoing maintenance cost burden and the initial increased renewal costs will have an impact on Council’s ability to fund the maintenance and renewals of all other timber structures throughout the Shire. Therefore in this instance the Heritage value of the bridge is seen to be of less importance.

Financial and Resources

Works are programmed to be carried out by Council's Bridge Team and project managed by Council’s Asset Officer, with design services provided by a consultant engineer.

Once the bridge is replaced, the cost to maintain the bridge will be greatly reduced.

Works can be carried out with minimal adjustment to the current Operational Plan.

Council currently collects a Special Rate Variation (SRV) for the purpose of renewal and upgrade of the only timber truss bridge, namely Pretty Point Bridge. This is not for maintenance; therefore once Pretty Point Bridge has been renewed the ongoing maintenance costs will be funded from Council's General Fund.

Once the Pretty Point Bridge is renewed it is expected the SRV funding will be transferred for all remaining timber bridge renewals and upgrades.

Referring to the previous report which is attached, Council officers are now at Stage 4 of the renewal. The funds available this year are outlined below. Works are planned to commence on Pretty Point Bridge in January 2017.

Funding source		Amount
SRV, and asset replacement reserve	$	300,000
Revote from 2015	$	185,000

Conclusion

The Pretty Point timber truss bridge whilst of Heritage value, is in poor condition and has been approved for renewal in modern equivalent Unibridge materials. To design the reinstallation of the old timber trusses onto the new bridge is proving to be difficult and extremely cost inhibitive. The primary purpose of the bridge is to serve the isolated communities of New Buildings and Rocky Hall and therefore given Council’s current and future resources, the bridge should be completed and be serviceable to the public as soon as practicable, without the reinstatement of the ornamental timber trusses.

Attachments

1. Advice from Andrew Marshman Associates

2. Extract of Ordinary Council Meeting Minutes 6 November 2013 with Pretty Point Bridge Replacement Adopted Recommendation

3. Council Report Pretty Point Bridge Replacement 6 November 2013

4. Timber Bridge Heritage Survey 2009

Recommendation

That the programmed works be carried out on the Pretty Point Bridge, using the Unibridge modular bridging system, without reinstating the timber trusses.

Council 23 November 2016

Item 12.3

12.3. Revitalisation of Bega Valley Shire Floodplain Risk Management Focus Group

Council’s existing Floodplain Risk Management Focus Group requires the nomination of a further two Councillor Delegates and modification of tenure for community representatives, following the resolution of recent Local Government elections.

Director Transport and Utilities

Background

Council at its meeting of 25 September 2013 resolved to form a Floodplain Risk Management Focus Group to assist with consultation over matters related to floodplain risk management.

The approved Focus Group composition and current status is outlined in Table 1 below:

Table 1: Bega Valley Shire Floodplain Risk Management Focus Group
Agency	Permissible representatives	Current representatives
Bega Valley Shire	2 Councillors and 3 officers	3 officers
Office of Environment and Heritage	2	1
Southern Region Local Land Services	1	Nil
State Emergency Services	1	1
Department of Planning	1	Nil
Department of Community Services	1	Nil
Community representatives	3	1

Council has two active floodplain risk management projects the Focus Group has been supporting:

· The Bega and Brogo Rivers Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan; and

· The Merimbula Lake and Back Lake Flood Study.

Co-incidentally, Council has selected the same consultant for both projects. A typical floodplain risk management project can take 18-36 months to complete.

Council also has an active Grant Application submitted to the Office of Environment and Heritage for a Flood Study of Twofold Bay and Towamba River at Towamba and Eden and surrounds. Council received notification of a grant offer but has yet to receive the corresponding funding agreement for consideration. Any decision to accept the grant offer will be made at a subsequent later meeting of Council.

The Focus Group (also commonly referred to as a Floodplain Risk Management Committee) is a requirement of the NSW State Government’s Floodplain Risk Management Process. Primarily, to provide focus and a forum for the discussion of technical, social, economic and ecological issues distilling possible differing viewpoints on these issues into recommendations to Council for subsequent Management Plans. An outline of typical focus group operations can be found in the Office of Environment and Heritage Floodplain Risk Management Committee Handbook July 2011.

Council also resolved to form a technical sub-committee comprising the following members to deal with technical issues ahead of Focus Group workshops. The current membership of the status is outlined in Table 2 below:

Table 2: Bega Valley Shire Floodplain Risk Management Technical Sub Committee
Agency	Permissible representatives	Current representatives
Bega Valley Shire Council	5 officers	3 officers (others co-opted as needed)
Council’s nominated consultant	One consultant per active project	1
Office of Environment and Heritage	2	1
Southern Local Land Services	1	Nil
State Emergency Services	1	1
Bureau of Meteorology	1	Vacant

As per Council’s adopted process, invitations were issued and a number of agencies declined to participate. An initial call for community representatives was unsuccessful during 2013, to assist with finalising the now completed Bega Flood Study. A subsequent call for community representatives in 2015 was successful in securing one representative from within the Bega and Brogo Rivers catchment to assist with the current Bega and Brogo Rivers Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan but unsuccessful in securing any representatives from with the Merimbula or Back Lake catchments.

Council’s original intention was, upon forming the Focus Group, to seek new nominations for Councillor and community representatives after each Local Government election to reflect changes over time and simultaneously, maintain continuity.

Also, as individual Floodplain Risk Management Plans are adopted by Council, individual Focus Groups or community representatives are not strictly required (under the NSW Government Floodplain Development Manual, the Management of Flood Liable Land, April 2005 (FDM)) but can be advantageous as Council becomes responsible for the implementation of any Floodplain Risk Management Plan. Also, it is not a strict requirement of the FDM that community representatives reside within the catchment under study although this is advantageous.

Issues

Legal

In accordance with Section 733 of the Local Government Act 1993, floodplain risk management in urban and rural areas in NSW is governed by the NSW Government’s Flood Prone Land Policy and its Floodplain Development Manual, the Management of Flood Liable Land, April 2005.

The Manual is available online from the Office of Environment and Heritage through the following link:

http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/floodplains/manual.htm

Locally, the NSW Government Policy is implemented through Council’s adopted Local Environmental Plan 2013, Clause 6.3 ‘Flood Risk Planning’ and Development Control Plan (DCP) 2013, Section 5.8.1 ‘Flood Planning’. Focus Group recommendations are purely advisory in nature as responsibility for planning matters lies with Council. The Focus Group’s principal objective is to assist Council in developing one or more Floodplain Risk Management Plans for the LGA. Any resultant recommendations from this Focus Group may necessitate a review of Council’s existing policies when Floodplain Risk Management Plans are eventually adopted.

Strategic

The completed floodplain risk management projects the Focus Group are supporting will form key technical documents for the implementation of a future Floodplain Risk Management Plan. The completed projects will allow Council to identify and manage the existing flood risks within the catchments under study. Strategic responses for land-use planning, asset planning, emergency response planning, environmental, social and economic impact management can then be formulated to address existing and future flood risk. The Focus Group plays a key role in developing desirable floodplain risk management outcomes for Council and its community.

Operational Plan

The projects being supported by the Focus Group meet the 2016/2017 Operational Plan ‘A4.1.1 Emergency Planning: Complete Flood Study and develop Floodplain Management Plan’.

Environmental / Sustainability

Environmental concerns such as climate change and catchment management practices will be addressed through the diverse composition of the Focus Group that typically include Council Planning and Environment staff, State Agency specialists and community representation.

Asset

The Focus Group and its technical sub-committee will provide input for floodplain risk management and minimisation strategies for Council and community assets as part of the overall Floodplain Risk Management Process.

Social / Cultural

Floodplains are the commercial, social and environmental arteries of the State. Transport and communication infrastructure are often located in floodplains which, generally as the more fertile areas, are a base for a significant proportion of the State’s agricultural business. Regular flooding enhances agricultural productivity by increasing soil moisture, recharging groundwater and depositing fertile silt across the floodplain. However, flooding can also interfere with production, communication, transport, emergency management and agricultural practices. Therefore development and management of floodplains needs to consider a broad range of issues including balancing the benefits of occupying the floodplain against the costs.

Social/cultural concerns will be addressed through the diverse composition of the Focus Group that includes Council officers, State Agency specialists and community representation.

Consultation

Providing consultation via a Focus Group is the subject of this report in order to meet current NSW Government requirements contained within the Floodplain Development Manual, the Management of Flood Liable Land, April 2005.

Financial and Resources

The ongoing operation of the Focus Group is expected to cost in the order of $1,000 per annum funded from stormwater operating expenses.

Funding source		Amount
Stormwater operating grant expenses	$	1000

Financial resources have already been expended in operating the current Focus Group. Future flood studies, floodplain risk management studies or implementation of Floodplain Risk Management Plans requiring any Focus Group input will also require officer and financial resources as they arise or as grants are secured. Other resources required will be meeting room facilities whenever any Focus Group or technical sub-committees are convened.

Conclusion

The current Focus Group membership requires revitalisation following the recent Local Government elections. Community representatives have been difficult to secure to support current Focus Group operations. An effective Focus Group is needed to comply with current NSW State Government requirements.

Attachments

1. NSW Office of Environment & Heritage Floodplain Risk Management Committee Handbook

Recommendation

1. That <insert names> be appointed as Councillor representatives for the Bega Valley Floodplain Risk Management Focus Group for the current term.

2. That the tenure of community representatives to be aligned with the individual projects rather than Local Government election cycle for continuity and due to difficulties in obtaining suitable representatives.

3. That the continuation of the current community representative from the Bega and Brogo River catchments be endorsed until the completion of the current Bega and Brogo Rivers Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan project.

4. That Council call for further expressions of interest for community representatives and State Agency representatives.

5. That Council agree to make the final selection of any new representatives on the Focus Group and its technical sub-committee.

Council	23 November 2016
*Item 12.3 - Attachment 1*	NSW Office of Environment & Heritage Floodplain Risk Management Committee Handbook

Council 23 November 2016

Item 12.4

12.4. Bermagui Men's Shed proposal to lease part of Old Bermagui Landfill Site

This report outlines the likely cost of works to enable the use of the old Bermagui Landfill Site by Bermagui Men’s Shed.

Director Transport and Utilities

Background

At the Council Meeting on 14 October 2015, Council received a report on this subject (Attachment 1 to this report) and resolved the following:

1. That Council procure consultancy services to develop a remediation plan for a portion of the old Bermagui Landfill site.

2. That a further report be prepared for Council on the potential cost of remediation works proposed.

3. That Council write to the Bermagui Men’s Shed indicating a commitment to the development of a remediation plan, with a decision on whether to proceed with remediation based on an assessment of the likely cost of the works.

4. That Council advise the Bermagui Men’s Shed the likely timeframe for the detailed investigation, consultancy report and decision on whether to proceed will be of the order of 12 months.

A thorough environmental and geotechnical assessment of the proposed Bermagui Men’s Shed (BMS) site has been conducted and a Remediation Action Plan (RAP) has been prepared for the site. The purpose of this report is primarily to advise Council of the likely costs of the work in accordance with Recommendation 2 above.

The RAP recommends minimising the amount of land for remediation by locating the proposed building in the eastern portion of the site, near the Bermagui-Tathra Road frontage (Attachment 2). The area that is be occupied by the proposed BMS would require a minimal removal (<1m depth) of waste material and replacement with clean fill to ensure the building is founded on solid ground, as well as ensuring environmental risks are minimised. The RAP also recommends removal of waste to a depth of one metre and replacement with clean fill in all areas of the site to be used by the community.

The total area to be remediated and therefore the cost of the work will be limited to the minimum area required to site the building and the facilities the BMS requires. This area has not been defined exactly, however it would be appropriate to negotiate with the BMS executive to ensure Council’s costs are minimised.

Subject to finalising the exact boundaries of the proposed remediation area in consultation with the BMS, a civil design would be prepared and a Development Application (DA) lodged for the proposed works.

Issues

Legal

State Environment Planning Policy Number 55 (SEPP55) Remediation of Land

The proposed remediation works are considered to be classified as “Category 1” Remediation Works, which requires specific consent to be consistent with the Council’s policy on contaminated land management. Bega Valley Shire Council specifies the remediation works will require Development Consent as the land is zoned as ‘E2 Environmental Conservation’ under the Bega Valley Local Environmental Plan 2013 and as such are considered to be Category 1.

Financial and Resources

Subject to the exact boundaries of the remediation work, the works will have costs estimated at $50,000 - $80,000, excluding waste disposal costs. The remediation works would be funded from the waste management reserve.

It is expected the proposed development of the shed and associated infrastructure would be largely financed separately by the BMS through community fundraising and would be the subject of a separate DA, subject to execution of a lease.

The unimproved land value of the north eastern portion of the site was independently assessed at $90,000. An investment in site remediation of an amount equivalent to the value of the land would be appropriate, enabling land that is currently of little or no value to be utilised for a valuable community purpose.

Conclusion

Council’s direction is sought with regard to proceeding to lodge a DA to remediate the site for the purpose of development of the Bermagui Men’s Shed.

Attachments

1. Attachment 1 Council Report Request by Bermagui Mens Shed for long term lease of
old Bermagui landfill site 14 October 2015

2. Attachment 2 Bermagui Men's Shed proposed Remediation Boundaries

Recommendation

1. Council to consult with the Bermagui Men’s Shed to determine the exact boundaries of the remediation area.

2. A civil design is prepared for the site and a Development Application lodged for the remediation work.

3. Subject to approval of the Development Application, that the remediation works are undertaken and financed from the Waste Management Reserve.

4. Subject to approval of the Development Application, Council negotiate the terms of a long term lease to the Bermagui Men’s Shed.

5. Subject to recommendations 1-4 above, that Council receive a further report to execute the lease.

Council 23 November 2016

Item 12.5

12.5. Bega Valley Local Traffic Committee

This report recommends Council adopt the advice of the Bega Valley Local Traffic Committee from their meeting held on 2 November 2016.

Director Transport and Utilities

Background

The Bega Valley Local Traffic Committee held a meeting on 2 November 2016, the Minutes of which have been distributed separately. It is a requirement for Council to formally adopt the recommendations from this Committee prior to action being taken. The recommendations were supported unanimously by the Committee.

Attachments

Nil

Recommendation

That Council adopt the recommendations of the Bega Valley Local Traffic Committee as follows:

Bega Town Block Party’ – 15 December 2016

1. That, subject to conditions, Hill Street, Bega be temporarily closed between the intersections of Auckland Street and Peden Street between 12pm and 12am on Thursday, 15 December 2016 for the ‘Bega Town Block Party’ event.

2. That the proposed traffic arrangements involving the temporary closure of Hill Street, Bega for the ‘Bega Town Block Party’ event on Thursday, 15 December 2016, be deemed a Class 2 special event and it be conducted under an approved Traffic Control Plan, in accordance with the Roads and Maritime Services Traffic Control Manual.

3. That persons involved in the preparation and implementation of the Traffic Control Plan must hold the appropriate NSW Roads and Maritime Services accreditation.

4. That organisers fully implement an approved Special Event Transport Management Plan.

5. That organisers have approved Public Liability insurance of at least $20 million indemnifying Bega Valley Shire Council, NSW Police and NSW Roads and Maritime Services by name for the event.

6. That organisers have written Police approval prior to conducting the event.

7. That the event achieves all conditions of Council’s Use of Public Land approval.

Merimbula Late Night Shopping – 17 December 2016

1. That, subject to conditions, Beach Street, Merimbula be temporarily closed between the intersections of Market Street and Alice Street between 2pm and 8pm on Saturday, 17 December 2016 for the ‘Our Merimbula Late Night Shopping’ event.

2. That the proposed traffic arrangements involving the temporary closure of the section of Beach Street, Merimbula for the ‘Our Merimbula Late Night Shopping’ event on Saturday, 17 December 2016, be deemed a Class 2 special event and it be conducted under an approved Traffic Control Plan, in accordance with the Roads and Maritime Services Traffic Control Manual.

3. That persons involved in the preparation and implementation of the Traffic Control Plan must hold the appropriate NSW Roads and Maritime Services accreditation.

4. That organisers fully implement an approved Special Event Transport Management Plan.

5. That organisers have approved Public Liability insurance of at least $20 million indemnifying Bega Valley Shire Council, NSW Police and NSW Roads and Maritime Services by name for the event.

6. That organisers have written Police approval prior to conducting the event.

7. That the event achieves all conditions of Council’s Use of Public Land approval.

Bermagui Artisan Markets – 17 December 2016

1. That, subject to conditions, a portion of the unnamed laneway between Wallaga Lake Road and Wapengo Street, Bermagui be temporarily closed between 7am and 4pm on Saturday, 17 December 2016 for the Bermagui Artisan Market event.

2. That the proposed traffic arrangements involving the temporary closure of the section of unnamed laneway between Wallaga Lake Road and Wapengo Street, Bermagui for the Bermagui Artisan Market event on Saturday, 17 December 2016, be deemed a Class 3 special event and it be conducted under an approved Traffic Control Plan, in accordance with the Roads and Maritime Services Traffic Control Manual.

3. That persons involved in the preparation and implementation of the Traffic Control Plan must hold the appropriate NSW Roads and Maritime Services accreditation.

4. That organisers fully implement an approved Special Event Transport Management Plan.

5. That organisers have approved Public Liability insurance of at least $20 million indemnifying Bega Valley Shire Council, NSW Police and NSW Roads and Maritime Services by name for the event.

6. That organisers have written Police approval prior to conducting the event.

Council 23 November 2016

Item 13.2

13.2. Formation of Future Planning Focus Groups

This report outlines preparations for Phase 2 of the consultation for the Bega Valley Community Strategic Plan 2040 which involves holding targeted engagement activities to identify goals and set priorities for issues identified in the Understanding Our Place Report.

General Manager

Background

Following the development of the recent Understanding Our Place Report, a series of draft community ambitions were compiled to reflect our community's main priorities and aspirations. These draft community ambitions are currently on public exhibition. When finalised and adopted, these community ambitions will form the cornerstones of the Bega Valley Community Strategic Plan 2040.

The development of the Understanding Our Place Report was the culmination of Phase 1 of the Community Engagement Strategy for the Community Strategic Plan. Phase 2 of the Engagement Strategy focusses on holding a series of workshops with Councillors, special interest groups, key government agencies, Council officers as well as interested members of the community.

These workshops or focus groups will discuss the issues identified in the Understanding Our Place Report. The objective of the focus groups is to bring people together for a targeted discussion to identify goals and set priorities to achieve community's ambitions (once they are finalised). These sessions will inform the development of statements about Council’s role in progressing advocating on behalf of the community for key outcomes to other levels of government and in focussing on the Delivery Plan which covers the areas where Council is directly involved.

Types of focus groups

It is proposed to hold a number of future planning focus groups depending on the level of Council involvement in the provision of the identified services and facilities. Two of the focus groups will provide input into the development of the Community Strategy Plan 2040 and three more are planned to provide input into the upcoming 2017-2021 Delivery Plan.

Details of the proposed topics to be covered in each of the focus groups have been circulated to Councilors via memo. A finalised version of the proposed topics in each focus group will be tabled at the meeting.

The five separate focus groups (2 x CSP & 3 x DP) that are proposed are:

Community Strategic Plan level

1. Advocacy and facilitation – planning, services and support

This focus group will bring together government and non-government agencies, community groups and interested community members who are involved in the planning for and provision of a range of services in our area where Council has a limited role in service provision. This group will explore ways in which Council can most effectively advocate for our community in relation to the provision of these services, and ways we can work collaboratively with other agencies and community groups to achieve the best outcomes for our communities

2. Advocacy and facilitation - infrastructure

This focus group will bring together government and non-government agencies, community groups and interested community members who are involved in infrastructure provision. This group will explore ways in which Council can most effectively advocate for our community in relation to the provision of infrastructure, and ways we can work collaboratively with other agencies and community groups to achieve the best outcomes for our communities

Delivery Plan level

3. Council processes and policy

This focus group will bring together a range of local professionals, government and non-government agencies, community groups and interested community members to identify goals, priorities and strategies that Council and other groups can consider.

4. Council services

This focus group will bring together a range community groups and interested community members to discuss the types and priorities of service standards for Council provided services and funded services provided by Council.

5. Council infrastructure

This focus group will bring together a range community groups and interested community members to discuss types and priorities of service standards for Council provided infrastructure.

Focus groups schedule

The focus groups will be facilitated by independent people and Council will play a role as a host and a participant in this process.

It is anticipated that the focus groups will be held at the Bega Valley Commemorative Civic Centre between the 6^th and 11^th of February 2017 and that each focus group will meet once for approximately three hours. In addition, participants will be supplied with background material to study prior to the focus group meeting.

Selection of focus groups participants

Council is seeking representation from a wide variety of interested people, stakeholders and groups to ensure that community expertise and input is utilized in the focus groups.

It is proposed to select other interested community members to attend relevant focus groups through a public expression of interest process.

In addition, participants of the recent IRIS Community Survey were asked if they were prepared to be involved in a series of meetings to help Council improve our level of service delivery. Those who answered affirmatively will be invited to attend a focus group.

Representatives of key government and non-government agencies will be contacted directly regarding their participation in the focus groups.

Written submission to focus group topics

It is likely that there are interested members of the community who are not able to attend the focus groups sessions in February. To enable these people to have some input into the process, it is proposed to receive written submissions to the focus groups until Friday 3 February 2017.

The information received in submissions will be distributed to the relevant focus groups.

Operational Plan

The delivery of the Community Strategic Plan 2040 consultation is an identified activity within the 2016-17 and 2017-18 Operational Plan. The delivery of this activity was designed to take place over two financial years

Consultation

The proposed activity is in accordance with Phase 2 of the Community Engagement Strategy for the Community Strategic Plan.

Conclusion

The formation of future planning focus groups is a key component in the delivery of the Bega Valley Community Strategic plan 2040. The focus groups will enable informed and detailed discussions of the issues affecting our community articulated through the community ambitions. They will help Council to identify goals and set priorities for the provision of Council services and facilities as well as formulate strategies and actions to help achieve broader community ambitions.

Attachments

Nil

Recommendation

That Council advertise for a period of 28 days for public nominations to the future planning focus groups as outlined in this report and the tabled memo.

Council 23 November 2016

Item 13.3

13.3. Actions from resolutions of Council - Status Report

This report provides a status update on staff actions from Council Resolutions over the past three months.

General Manager

Background

In order to ensure the community and Councillors are kept updated on the progress of implementation and actions from Council Resolutions, a formal quarterly reporting process is now in place. Current protocol involved the recording of Council Resolutions as “Minute Instructions”. Following each Council meeting the Resolutions are tasked to an officer in Council’s electronic Report System - InfoCouncil. Progress of actions undertaken in relation to respective resolutions is monitored by senior staff through the use of the Minute Instructions, which are printed and made available at each Council meeting.

To improve transparency, a process has been introduced so that each quarter a report is provided to formally update Council. This update notes comments and actions against all Council Resolutions for the previous quarter.

Attached to this business paper is the report for the period 1 July 2016 to 30 September 2016. It provides information to Councillors and the community on the status of those actions taken on Resolutions over the past three months. The report on actions will also be available on Council’s website.

Conclusion

Councillors and members of the community are interested in the progress of actions against Council Resolutions. This process provides a formal report back to Council on a quarterly basis and then provides the information openly to the community via Council’s website.

All actions for the period 1/7/2016 have been completed. A list of completed actions for that period is attached.

Attachments

1. Completed Council actions 01/07/2016 to 30/09/2016

Recommendation

That Council note the status reports on actions from Council’s Resolutions for the period 1 July 2016 to 30 September 2016.

Council 23 November 2016

Item 13.4

13.4. 2015 - 16 Annual Report

Council’s 2015-16 Annual Report is presented for the information of Councillors. The report is required to be lodged with the Office of Local Government by 30 November 2016.

Director Strategy and Business Services

Background

Each year Council is required to produce a comprehensive Annual Report that provides details on the organisation’s activities and finances over the period of the previous financial year. The Annual Report is one of the key points of accountability between Council and our community. Under the Integrated Planning and Reporting framework, the Annual Report focuses on Council’s achievements towards the Community Strategic Plan framework, and also includes some information that is prescribed by the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005. Council’s Audited Financial Report and itemised update against the Operational Plan are provided as attachments to the Annual Report. The NSW Office of Local Government provides Guidelines for the development of the Annual Report and requires a copy of the report for its records.

The 2015-16 Annual Report includes updates against Council’s major projects covering: the Bega Civic Centre; Eden Port; Town Centre design projects; Littleton Gardens; Merimbula Airport; Merimbula By Pas; Merimbula effluent management project; Tura Marrang Library and Community Centre; and Fit for the Future Process. In addition to highlighting progress in the Annual Report, Major Projects are also updated quarterly and reported to Council and published on the Council website.

The report also highlights achievements against the Delivery/Operational Plan by theme area with an overview of projects.

Issues

Legal

For the purposes of section 428 (4)(b) of the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act), an Annual Report of a council is to include the following information:

· Details of overseas visits undertaken during the year by councillors, council officers or other persons while representing the council (including visits sponsored by other organisations).

§ Details of the total cost during the year of the payment of the expenses of, and the provision of facilities to, councillors in relation to their civic functions (as paid by the council reimbursed to the councillor or reconciled with the councillor), including separate details on the total cost of each of the following:

§ the provision during the year of dedicated office equipment allocated to councillors on a personal basis, such as laptop computers, mobile telephones and landline telephones and facsimile machines installed in councillor's homes (including equipment and line rental costs and internet access costs but not including call costs),

§ telephone calls made by councillors, including calls made from mobile telephones provided by the council and from landline telephones and facsimile services installed in councillors’ homes,

§ the attendance of councillors at conferences and seminars,

§ the training of councillors and the provision of skill development for councillors,

§ interstate visits undertaken during the year by councillors while representing the council, including the cost of transport, the cost of accommodation and other out-of-pocket travelling expenses,

§ overseas visits undertaken during the year by councillors while representing the council, including the cost of transport, the cost of accommodation and other out-of-pocket travelling expenses,

§ the expenses of any spouse, partner (whether of the same or the opposite sex) or other person who accompanied a councillor in the performance of his or her civic functions, being expenses payable in accordance with the Guidelines for the payment of expenses and the provision of facilities for Mayors and Councillors for Local Councils in NSW prepared by the Director-General from time to time,

§ expenses involved in the provision of care for a child of, or an immediate family member of, a councillor, to allow the councillor to undertake his or her civic functions.

§ Details of each contract awarded by the council during that year (whether as a result of tender or otherwise) other than:

§ employment contracts (that is, contracts of service but not contracts for services), and

§ contracts for less than $150,000 or such other amount as may be prescribed by the regulations, including the name of the contractor, the nature of the goods or services supplied by the contractor and the total amount payable to the contractor under the contract.

§ A summary of the amounts incurred by the council during the year in relation to legal proceedings taken by or against the council (including amounts, costs and expenses paid or received by way of out of court settlements, other than those the terms of which are not to be disclosed) and a summary of the state of progress of each legal proceeding and (if it has been finalised) the result.

§ Details or a summary as required by section 67 (3) of the Act of resolutions made during that year under section 67 of the Act concerning work carried out on private land and details or a summary of such work if the cost of the work has been fully or partly subsidised by the council, together with a statement of the total amount by which the council has subsidised any such work during that year.

§ The total amount contributed or otherwise granted under section 356 of the Act.

§ A statement of all external bodies that during that year exercised functions delegated by the council,

§ A statement of all corporations, partnerships, trusts, joint ventures, syndicates or other bodies (whether or not incorporated) in which the council (whether alone or in conjunction with other councils) held a controlling interest during that year,

§ A statement of all corporations, partnerships, trusts, joint ventures, syndicates or other bodies (whether or not incorporated) in which the council participated during that year,

§ A statement of the activities undertaken by the council during that year to implement its equal employment opportunity management plan.

§ A statement of the total remuneration comprised in the remuneration package of the general manager during the year that is to include the total of the following:

§ the total value of the salary component of the package,

§ the total amount of any bonus payments, performance payments or other payments made to the general manager that do not form part of the salary component of the general manager,

§ the total amount payable by the council by way of the employer’s contribution or salary sacrifice to any superannuation scheme to which the general manager may be a contributor,

§ the total value of any non-cash benefits for which the general manager may elect under the package,

§ the total amount payable by the council by way of fringe benefits tax for any such non-cash benefits.

§ A statement of the total remuneration comprised in the remuneration packages of all senior staff members (other than the general manager) employed during the year, expressed as the total remuneration of all the senior staff members concerned (not of the individual senior staff members) and including totals of each of the following:

§ the total of the values of the salary components of their packages,

§ the total amount of any bonus payments, performance payments or other payments made to them that do not form part of the salary components of their packages,

§ the total amount payable by the council by way of the employer’s contribution or salary sacrifice to any superannuation scheme to which any of them may be a contributor,

§ the total value of any non-cash benefits for which any of them may elect under the package,

§ the total amount payable by the council by way of fringe benefits tax for any such non-cash benefits.

§ If the council has levied an annual charge for stormwater management services - a statement detailing the stormwater management services provided by the council during that year,

§ If the council has levied an annual charge for coastal protection services - a statement detailing the coastal protection services provided by the council during that year,

§ A detailed statement, prepared in accordance with such guidelines as may be issued by the Director-General from time to time, of the council’s activities during the year in relation to enforcing, and ensuring compliance with, the provisions of the Companion Animals Act 1998 and the regulations under that Act.

Conclusion

2015-16 Annual Report has been prepared to comply with the legislative requirements and to overview the achievements against the 2015-16 Operational Plan. The Annual Report is to be provided to the Office of the Local Government by 30 November 2016. It will also be published on the Council’s website on November 30 2016.

Attachments

Nil

Recommendation

That the 2015-16 Annual Report be endorsed for publishing on Council website, provision of hard copies to Bega Valley Shire Council library branches and lodged with the NSW Office of Local Government.

Council 23 November 2016

Item 14.1

14.1. Presentation of Audited Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2016

This report presents the draft financial statements to Council to be confirmed by the presentation of the Audited Financial Statements to Council on 23 November 2016.

Director Strategy and Business Services

Background

Council’s Financial Reports for the year ended 30 June 2016 have been completed and in accordance with Section 418 (1) of the Local Government Act are now presented to the public.

Council’s Auditor, RSM Australia Pty Ltd have completed the audit of the financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2016 in accordance with Section 415 of the Local Government Act, 1993. The financial statements include the general purpose consolidated accounts of Council and its controlled entities and the special purpose financial statements, detailing the income and expenditure of Council’s business units and their financial position at balance date. The audit opinions on the 2016 financial statements of Council are issued without qualification.

Public Notices advising of this meeting were placed in the Bega District News, Merimbula News Weekly and Eden Magnet.

In accordance with Section 420 of the Local Government Act 1993, any person may make a submission in writing with respect to Council’s Audited Financial Reports or the Auditor’s Report. The closing date for submissions is the 30^th November 2016. Copies have been placed on public display at the Council Administration Building (Zingle Place Bega). A PDF copy can also be downloaded from Council’s website.

Issues

Financial

Council has achieved an operating result of $3,875k across all Funds (General, Water, and Sewer).

Operating Revenues:

Bega Valley Shire Council (Council’s) operating revenues have increased by 3% in 2016. This is due to Council being able to secure additional grant funds in operational areas. There has been a decrease in amount of capital grants received as the grant programs are moving to project based allocation instead of program based allocation. Also the investment returns were significantly down (22% from 2015 FY) due to declining interest rates.

Council’s revenues detailed as follows:

Item	2015	2014	$ Mvmt	%
Rates & Annual Charges	46,531	44,723	1,808	4%
Operating Grants & Contributions	15,780	14,317	1,463	10%
User Charges	15,640	14,831	809	5%
Investment Returns	1,698	2,164	(466)	-22%
Sale of Assets & Other	1,344	1,262	82	6%
Capital Grants	6,380	7,195	(815)	-11%
	87,373	84,492	2,881	3%

Operating Expenditure:

Operating Expenses increased by 7% in the 2016 financial year.

The major contributor to the increase was increase in cost of raw materials and consumables.

Balance Sheet:

Overall Council saw a decrease in net assets of $5.8M. This was mainly attributable to net decrease in Infrastructure, Property, Plant and Equipment of $2.6M primarily due to revaluation decrement of community land assets, swimming pools, waste infrastructure and airport.

Financial Ratios:

Council is required to report the following ratios to the Office of Local Government:

Operating Performance Ratio | Benchmark > 0%

This ratio measures Council’s achievement of containing operating expenditure within operating revenue.

Council's Operating Performance Ratio is still a deficit but this is due to higher deficits in Water and Sewer Funds. General Fund is a surplus result.

Own Source Operating Revenue Ratio | Benchmark > 60%

This ratio measures fiscal flexibility. It is the degree of reliance on external funding sources such as operating grants and contributions.

Council is above the benchmark for own source revenue. An integral part of Council’s adopted Long Term Financial Plan is to attempt to increase own source revenues. Unfortunately as the State and Federal Government reduce the number and value of grants available to Local Government, this ratio starts to show Councils having to rely on own source revenue to fund their works programs.

Unrestricted Current Ratio | Benchmark >1.5X

The ratio measures the adequacy of working capital and its ability to satisfy obligations in the short term for the unrestricted activities of Council.

Council’s unrestricted current ratio is below benchmark as unrestricted cash balance increases, the ratio will come back above the benchmark.

Debt Service Cover Ratio | Benchmark > 2.0X

The ratio measures the availability of operating cash to service debt including interest, principal and lease payments.

Council's debt service ratio is in strong position. Council has sufficient fund to meet its debt obligation. Council holds approximately $33M in debt across all three funds. Council's Long Term Financial Plan outlines that Council will see draw down of more debt to enable Council to reduce infrastructure backlog and construct some community priority projects while still remaining below the benchmark.

Rates, Annual Charges, Interest & Extra Charges Outstanding Percentage | Benchmark < 5%

This ratio assesses the impact of uncollected rates and annual charges on Council’s liquidity and the adequacy of recovery efforts.

Outstanding Rates, Charges and fees are 3.71% which is within industry benchmark for rural councils of 10%. Council has strong debt collection procedures in place to collect its rates and charges.

Council has managed to maintain an outstanding collection percentage close to the Office of Local Government benchmark for a number of years now. It is critical Council keep this ratio as low as possible to aid with Council's cash flow. For example, allowing this ratio to increase by 1% will result in more than $500,000 that Council will not collect and by extension would not be able to utilise to resource works in the community. This could either lead to the work not being performed or alternate funding arrangement being made, such as borrowings, increased fees, etc. It is worth noting Council has seen its recovery costs increase from approximately $40k in 2009 to approximately $380k in 2016. These costs are passed onto the ratepayers that Councils has had to instigate collection on. No costs are passed onto the general rate base.

Cash Expense Cover Ratio

This liquidity ratio indicates the number of months a council can continue paying for its immediate expenses without additional cash inflow.

Council again has a very strong liquidity ratio and is well above the benchmark.

Services:

While the financial statements provide a high level view of Council as an entity, it is worth noting that while a large portion of Council's finances go to maintain the infrastructure that we use on a daily basis, there is a significant portion of Council's revenues that provide many services back to the community such as:

§ $10.2M on Environmental Management projects.

§ $4.7M on Community Support projects.

§ $1.1M on Economic Development projects.

The chart below illustrates 2015 operating expenditure $ per function with comparative.

Council’s financial results for the 2016 financial year are indicative of the approach Council has taken over the past few years. The adoption of the Community Strategic Plan, the Asset Management Plans, and the Long Term Financial Plan has allowed Council to set out a pathway for the short to mid-term horizon. The results as reported for 2016 illustrate that Council is progressing well. All indicators are satisfactory and Council's finances remain in a healthy position.

Council has also undergone several internal and external audits during the 2016 financial year. All of these reviews have indicated Council is in a stable and sound financial position.

Click here to view the Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2016

Attachments

Nil

Recommendation

That Council note the tabled audited 2016 Financial Statements.

Council 23 November 2016

Item 14.2

14.2. Quarterly Budget Review Statement (QBRS) at September 2016

Budget review statements are prepared and presented to Council quarterly in

accordance with Section 203 of the Local Government (General) Regulations 2005.

Director Strategy and Business Services

Background

Under the Integrated Planning and Reporting (IPR) Guidelines, a Quarterly Budget Review Statement (QBRS) must be presented to Council for each financial quarter.

The QBRS is presented in a summary format which shows Council’s income and expenses by type and by activity. The capital budget review statement is also prepared by type and by activity followed by variance details.

It is the intent of this report to provide information to the users of the QBRS report in order to illustrate the financial performance of Council as a whole and for each activity of Council.

Council staff retains the ability to enquire, transact, and report on the detailed General Ledger, which includes budgets. If there are specific questions relating to detailed transactional information, staff can provide answers to those questions.

Issues

Legal

Clause 203 of the Local Government (General) Regulations 2005 states:

Budget review statements and revision of estimates

1. Not later than two months after the end of each quarter (except the June quarter), the responsible accounting officer of a council must prepare and submit to the council a budget review statement that shows, by reference to the estimate of income and expenditure set out in the statement of the council’s revenue policy included in the operational plan for the relevant year, a revised estimate of the income and expenditure for that year.

2. A budget review statement must include or be accompanied by:

a. A report as to whether or not the responsible accounting officer believes that the statement indicates that the financial position of the council is satisfactory, having regard to the original estimate of income and expenditure, and

b. If that position is unsatisfactory, recommendations for remedial action.

c. A budget review statement must also include any information required by the Code to be included in such a statement.

Financial

The QBRS reports the detailed variances for the September 2016 quarter. The September QBRS generally only includes the revotes from the preceding year as variances. Revotes are those works committed to in the preceding year that were not completed. The works are shifted into the current year with an increase in the relevant expenditure lines and a corresponding increase in funding from the preceding year.

The value of carry forward from the 2016 financial year equal $3.156 Mil. These transfers relate to unspent grants of $2.848 Mil and other committed expenditure along with their funding sources.

There are no major or significant variances to report to Council. A more detailed analysis is located within the QBRS attachment.

As at the end of September 2016, Council held $60.7 Mil in cash and investments – the bulk of which remain restricted for use with planned infrastructure or projects preconditioned by loans, grants or development contributions.

As per Council’s policy, the QBRS reflects the budget in a balanced position and maintains working capital at adopted levels. All net movements are factored through the movement to and from reserves, including anticipated transfers to asset, ELE and property reserves at year end.

Conclusion

Council’s September 2016 QBRS has been presented to Council. Council financial performance is healthy and within the operating budget set by Council in June 2016.

Attachments

1. September 2016 Quarterly Budget Review Statement

Recommendation

1. That Council note and endorse the September 2016 Quarterly Budget Review Statement (QBRS).

2. That Council adopt the variances to its operating budget as outlined in the QBRS.

3. That Council place the QBRS for September 2016 on its website for public information.

Council 23 November 2016

Item 16.1

16.1. Local Government NSW Annual Conference 2016

Councillors attended the Local Government NSW Annual Conference held in Wollongong from the 16 to 19 October, 2016. Delegate reports are presented for the information of the community and other Councillors.

Cr McBain, Mayor

Cr Kristy McBain

The 2016 NSW Local Government Conference in Wollongong was the best local government conference I have attended to date.

I attended a session on the changes that have been implemented to the Local Government Act and some of the proposed and/or suspected changes to come. Following on from the recent Fit for the Future regime and elections it is clear that the aim is to ensure clear defined roles of mayor/councillors and to set a professional development program to make sure local government continues to evolve and change for future developments in the local government sphere.

A number of keynote speakers presented over the two days including Peter McKinlay who discussed the requirement for councils to look more at strategic planning for the ever changing needs of our communities, Kitty Chiller who spoke about resilience in leadership and leadership challenges and addresses from the Premier Mike Baird, Minister for Local Government Mr Paul Toole, and Minister for Aged Care and Disability Ajaka.

I appreciated the 15 minutes in which I got to discuss the IPART rating review with the Minister for Local Government especially the proposed removal of rating exemption for land below the high water mark (oyster and aquaculture leases) and expressed how this could have a significant impact on our local industry.

All in all this was a very successful and informative conference.

Cr Sharon Tapscott

This year's Conference was a much better experience than the first NSW LGA Conference I went to.

The business paper and agenda was well organised and the meeting well run.

We got through all the business on the Agenda in a timely fashion.

I was very pleased to observe our two Motions went through unopposed as the calibre of business was very high and the Motions spoke to many concerns within Local Government in both rural and metro areas.

The breakout sessions were informative and the sponsors /trade displays were very interesting and relevant.

I personally spoke with Minister John Ajaka , Minister for Ageing and Disability.

We spoke about the east coast low (storm) damage to infrastructure, particularly the infrastructure to help the disabled enjoy recreational areas and the inability of the disaster recovery funding (NDRRF) to cover these items. He was very interested and has expressed a desire to visit the area. I believe a formal invitation has gone out to his office.

I was also able to speak with Minister Paul Toole, Minister for Local Government. He was very generous with his time. I will let the Mayor expand on that conversation.

I hope the new councillors found the experience as worthwhile as I did.

Cr Cathy Griff

The Conference certainly offered useful network opportunities. Greens Councillors from across NSW met to exchange information about what had been working for their Council especially in environment and social services. Keynote speaker Peter McKinlay was inspiring in describing what might be achieved at Local Government level, with an emphasis on leadership, identity of place, soft or social assets and community collaboration. The core business of passing resolutions was instructive in how the process similarly operates for Council meetings.

The 'Natural Resources and Environment' stream was a highlight for hearing about the Environment Protection Authority's comprehensive grants scheme. There were also valuable lessons on the increasingly important and complex field of waste and recycling. Environment Protection Authority (EPA) managers of organic waste are keen to pass on information and case studies of best practice.

Overall the Conference reflected high emotion and widespread criticism over the consequences and handling of forced Council amalgamations. It made delegates very aware of how fortunate Bega Valley Shire is to have been judged 'Fit for the Future', thanks to competent management.

Attachments

Nil

Council 23 November 2016

Item 18.1

18.1. Cr Sharon Tapscott - East West transport corridor - Imlay Road

Background

It has become increasingly clear that the Bega Valley Shire can no longer rely on the Brown Mountain section of road (part of the Snowy Mountains Highway) as our primary East-West corridor for the movement of freight and tourists.

To continue to rely on this road as our first option for the East-West corridor linking the Far South Coast to the Hume Highway through Canberra will only stall any economic development of the Port of Eden and any other prospective development throughout the Shire.

The topography of the road does not lend itself to the much needed improvement to our Shire’s gateway, which is necessary to take advantage of all opportunities which will open up through the Eden Wharf development and Merimbula Airport upgrades.

The best option for the East-West corridor is Imlay Road, South of Eden. It is a superior road by any measure and in the absence of rail options it should be a serious consideration.

To progress this option, the State Government would need to transfer Imlay Road from its current designation (it is a State Forest road) to a State Road, and to this end I recommend Bega Valley Shire Council write to our Local Member, the Hon Andrew Constance, Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, enquiring as to how we might progress this option.

To continue to rely on the Snowy Mountains Highway will continue to inhibit the Shire’s ability to grow and take advantage of economic opportunities and, further, it is in the State’s best interest to facilitate and encourage all areas to reach their full potential.

Cr Sharon Tapscott

Attachments

Nil

Notice of Motion

That Bega Valley Shire Council write to our Local Member, Hon Andrew Constance, Minister for Transport and Infrastructure requesting he formally investigate the possibility of designating Imlay Road, as a State road managed by the Roads and Maritime Service, with the intention of making it the primary East/West corridor, feeding into the Hume highway through the ACT for the purpose of relieving the Far South Coast’s reliance on the Snowy Mountains Highway.

Council	23 November 2016
*Item 10.1 - Attachment 1*	Cemetery Advisory Committee Guidelines - Draft 2016

Council	23 November 2016
*Item 10.1 - Attachment 2*	Corporate Management Committee Cemetery Review - August 2009

Council	23 November 2016
*Item 12.1 - Attachment 1*	Tarlinton submission opposing proposed road name Dhurga Lane Tathra 20160907

Council	23 November 2016
*Item 12.1 - Attachment 2*	Horton submission opposing proposed road name Sabina Way Eden 20160823

Council	23 November 2016
*Item 12.1 - Attachment 3*	Walker submission opposing proposed road name Sabina Way Eden 20160907

Council	23 November 2016
*Item 12.1 - Attachment 4*	Cunning submission opposing proposed road name Bertha Way Eden 20161004

Council	23 November 2016
*Item 12.2 - Attachment 1*	Advice from Andrew Marshman Associates

Council	23 November 2016
*Item 12.2 - Attachment 2*	Extract of Ordinary Council Meeting Minutes 6 November 2013 with Pretty Point Bridge Replacement Adopted Recommendation

Council	23 November 2016
*Item 12.2 - Attachment 3*	Council Report Pretty Point Bridge Replacement 6 November 2013

Council	23 November 2016
*Item 12.2 - Attachment 4*	Timber Bridge Heritage Survey 2009

Council	23 November 2016
*Item 12.4 - Attachment 1*	Attachment 1 Council Report Request by Bermagui Mens Shed for long term lease of / old Bermagui landfill site 14 October 2015

Council	23 November 2016
*Item 12.4 - Attachment 2*	Attachment 2 Bermagui Men's Shed proposed Remediation Boundaries

Council	23 November 2016
*Item 13.1 - Attachment 1*	Internal Audit Committee Annual Report 2015/16

Council	23 November 2016
*Item 13.3 - Attachment 1*	Completed Council actions 01/07/2016 to 30/09/2016

Council	23 November 2016
*Item 14.2 - Attachment 1*	September 2016 Quarterly Budget Review Statement

Ordinary

Meeting Notice and Agenda

To:

Copy:

Live Streaming of Council Meetings

Publishing Of Agendas And Minutes

Ethical Decision Making and Conflicts of Interest

A guiding checklist for Councillors, officers and community committees

Ethical decision making

Conflict of interest

The test for conflict of interest

Identifying problems

Agency advice

Disclosure of pecuniary interests / non-pecuniary conflict of interests

Agenda

Statement of Commencement of Live Streaming

Acknowledgement of Traditional Owners of Bega Valley Shire

1 Apologies and requests for leave of absence

2 Confirmation Of Minutes

3 Declarations

4 Deputations (by prior arrangement)

5 Petitions

6 Mayoral Minutes

7 Urgent Business

8 Adjournment to Standing Committees

Recommendation

9 Staff Reports – Planning and Environment (Sustainability)

10 Staff Reports – Community, Culture and Leisure (Liveability)

11 Staff Reports –Economic Development and Business Growth (Enterprising)

12 Staff Reports – Infrastructure Waste and Water (Accessibility)

13 Staff Reports – Governance and Strategy (Leading Organisation)

14 Staff Reports – Finance (Leading Organisation)

15 Adoption of Reports from Standing Committees

Recommendation

16 Delegates Reports

17 Rescission/alteration Motions

18 Notices of Motion

19 Questions On Notice

20 Questions for the Next Meeting

21 Confidential Business

Statement of Cessation of Live Streaming for the period of the Closed Session.

Statement of Re-Commencement of Live Streaming

22 Adoption of reports from Closed Session

23 Resolutions to declassify reports considered in closed session

Council

23 November 2016

Staff Reports – Community, Culture and Leisure (Liveability)

23 November 2016

Council

23 November 2016

Staff Reports – Infrastructure Waste And Water(Accessibility)

23 November 2016

12.1. Naming of a laneway in Tathra and road in Eden

Background

Laneway in Tathra

Road in Eden

Financial and Resources

Conclusion

Attachments

Recommendation

Council

23 November 2016

Staff Reports – Governance And Strategy (Leading Organisation)

23 November 2016

Staff Reports – Finance (Leading Organisation)

23 November 2016

18.2. Cr Tony Allen - Littleton Gardens Toilets

Background

Attachments

Notice of Motion

18.3. Cr Tony Allen - Works on Land purchased by Council at 77 - 79 Auckland Street, Bega

Background

Attachments

Notice of Motion

18.4. Cr Robyn Bain - Eden Pool heating

Background

The previous Council commissioned Otium Planning Group to undertake an Aquatic Facilities Review and in June 2016 the draft Report went out to the community for public discussion.

Via a Question on Notice by Cr Bain, the new Council received this report along with the Aquatic Facilities Strategy. In the meantime the Eden community has been working to improve the conditions for users at the Eden pool, specifically on the temperature of the pool.

There are a number of pool heating models that can be investigated. Examples include: solar heating (used in some of our pools); heat pumps (used in some of our pools); and thermal heating (utilised at Bungendore pool).

Attachments