OrdinaryMeeting Notice and Agenda
An Ordinary Meeting of the Bega Valley Shire Council will be held at Council Chambers, Biamanga Room Bega Valley Commemorative Civic Centre
Bega on
|
Council meetings are recorded and live streamed to the Internet for public viewing. By entering the Chambers during an open session of Council, you consent to your attendance and participation being recorded.
The recording will be archived and made available on Council’s website www.begavalley.nsw.gov.au. All care is taken to maintain your privacy; however as a visitor of the public gallery, your presence may be recorded.
The Agendas for Council Meetings and Council Reports for each meeting will be available to the public on Council’s website as close as possible to 5.00 pm on the Thursday prior to each Ordinary Meeting. A hard copy is also made available at the Bega Administration Building reception desk and on the day of the meeting, in the Council Chambers.
The Minutes of Council Meetings are available on Council's Website as close as possible to 5.00 pm on the Monday after the Meeting.
1. Please be aware that the recommendations in the Council Meeting Agenda are recommendations to the Council for consideration. They are not the resolutions (decisions) of Council.
2. Background for reports is provided by staff to the Chief Executive Officer for presentation to Council.
3. The Council may adopt these recommendations, amend the recommendations, determine a completely different course of action, or it may decline to pursue any course of action.
4. The decision of the Council becomes the resolution of the Council, and is recorded in the Minutes of that meeting.
5. The Minutes of each Council meeting are published in draft format, and are confirmed by Councillors, with amendments if necessary, at the next available Council Meeting.
If you require any further information or clarification regarding a report to Counci, please contact Council’s Executive Assistant who can provide you with the appropriate contact details
Phone (6499 2222) or email execassist@begavalley.nsw.gov.au.
· Is the decision or conduct legal?
· Is it consistent with Government policy, Council’s objectives and Code of Conduct?
· What will the outcome be for you, your colleagues, the Council, anyone else?
· Does it raise a conflict of interest?
· Do you stand to gain personally at public expense?
· Can the decision be justified in terms of public interest?
· Would it withstand public scrutiny?
A conflict of interest is a clash between private interest and public duty. There are two types of conflict:
· Pecuniary – regulated by the Local Government Act 1993 and Office of Local Government
· Non-pecuniary – regulated by Codes of Conduct and policy. ICAC, Ombudsman, Office of Local Government (advice only). If declaring a Non-Pecuniary Conflict of Interest, Councillors can choose to either disclose and vote, disclose and not vote or leave the Chamber.
· Is it likely I could be influenced by personal interest in carrying out my public duty?
· Would a fair and reasonable person believe I could be so influenced?
· Conflict of interest is closely tied to the layperson’s definition of ‘corruption’ – using public office for private gain.
· Important to consider public perceptions of whether you have a conflict of interest.
1st Do I have private interests affected by a matter I am officially involved in?
2nd Is my official role one of influence or perceived influence over the matter?
3rd Do my private interests conflict with my official role?
For more detailed definitions refer to Sections 442, 448 and 459 or the Local Government Act 1993 and Bega Valley Shire Council (and Model) Code of Conduct, Part 4 – conflictions of interest.
Whilst seeking advice is generally useful, the ultimate decision rests with the person concerned.Officers of the following agencies are available during office hours to discuss the obligations placed on Councillors, officers and community committee members by various pieces of legislation, regulation and codes.
Contact |
Phone |
|
Website |
Bega Valley Shire Council |
(02) 6499 2222 |
council@begavalley.nsw.gov.au |
www.begavalley.nsw.gov.au |
ICAC |
8281 5999 Toll Free 1800 463 909 |
icac@icac.nsw.gov.au |
www.icac.nsw.gov.au |
Office of Local Government |
(02) 4428 4100 |
olg@olg.nsw.gov.au |
http://www.olg.nsw.gov.au/ |
NSW Ombudsman |
(02) 8286 1000 Toll Free 1800 451 524 |
nswombo@ombo.nsw.gov.au |
Under the provisions of Section 451(1) of the Local Government Act 1993 (pecuniary interests) and Part 4 of the Model Code of Conduct prescribed by the Local Government (Discipline) Regulation (conflict of interests) it is necessary for you to disclose the nature of the interest when making a disclosure of a pecuniary interest or a non-pecuniary conflict of interest at a meeting.
The following form should be completed and handed to the Chief Executive Officer as soon as practible once the interest is identified. Declarations are made at Item 3 of the Agenda: Declarations - Pecuniary, Non-Pecuniary and Political Donation Disclosures, and prior to each Item being discussed:
Council meeting held on __________(day) / ___________(month) /____________(year)
Item no & subject |
|
Pecuniary Interest
|
In my opinion, my interest is pecuniary and I am therefore required to take the action specified in section 451(2) of the Local Government Act 1993 and or any other action required by the Chief Executive Officer. |
Significant Non-pecuniary conflict of interest |
– In my opinion, my interest is non-pecuniary but significant. I am unable to remove the source of conflict. I am therefore required to treat the interest as if it were pecuniary and take the action specified in section 451(2) of the Local Government Act 1993. |
Non-pecuniary conflict of interest |
In my opinion, my interest is non-pecuniary and less than significant. I therefore make this declaration as I am required to do pursuant to clause 5.11 of Council’s Code of Conduct. However, I intend to continue to be involved with the matter. |
Nature of interest |
Be specific and include information such as : · The names of any person or organization with which you have a relationship · The nature of your relationship with the person or organization · The reason(s) why you consider the situation may (or may be perceived to) give rise to a conflict between your personal interests and your public duty as a Councillor. |
If Pecuniary |
Leave chamber |
If Non-pecuniary (tick one) |
Disclose & vote Disclose & not vote Leave chamber |
Reason for action proposed |
Clause 5.11 of Council’s Code of Conduct provides that if you determine that a non-pecuniary conflict of interest is less than significant and does not require further action, you must provide an explanation of why you consider that conflict does not require further action in the circumstances |
Print Name |
I disclose the above interest and acknowledge that I will take appropriate action as I have indicated above. |
Signed |
|
NB: Please complete a separate form for each Item on the Council Agenda on which you are declaring an interest.
Council |
6 October 2021 |
Recommendation
That the Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting and Closed Session held on 22 September 2021 as circulated, be taken as read and confirmed.
Pecuniary, Non-Pecuniary and Political Donation Disclosures to be declared and tabled. Declarations also to be declared prior to discussion on each item.
8.1 Lots 33 & 34 DP505878, Lot 36 DP505879, Lot 6 DP64421, Lot 91 DP709087, Lot 60 DP732500, Lot 5 Sec 2 DP758379, Lot 1 DP1158312 - 215-217 and 221-223 Imlay Street, Eden............. 8
Nil Reports
Nil Reports
11.1 Eden Community Access Centre licence renewal.................................................................. 140
11.2 Community Hall Maintenance Funding 2021/2022............................................................... 148
11.3 RFT 2021-125 Provision of Beach Lifeguard Services............................................................ 154
11.4 Possible exchange of land between Council and the Merimbula RSL Club....................... 159
Nil Reports
13.1 Carry Forwards and Revotes at End of Financial Year 2021................................................. 168
Representations by members of the public regarding closure of part of meeting
Adjournment Into Closed Session, exclusion of the media and public........................... 184
Council |
6 October 2021 |
8.1 Lots 33 & 34 DP505878, Lot 36 DP505879, Lot 6 DP64421, Lot 91 DP709087, Lot 60 DP732500, Lot 5 Sec 2 DP758379, Lot 1 DP1158312 - 215-217 and 221-223 Imlay Street, Eden....................................................................................................................... 8
Council 6 October 2021 |
Item 8.1 |
8.1. 2021.376 Lots 33 & 34 DP505878, Lot 36 DP505879, Lot 6 DP64421, Lot 91 DP709087, Lot 60 DP732500, Lot 5 Sec 2 DP758379, Lot 1 DP1158312 - 215-217 and 221-223 Imlay Street, Eden
Director Community Environment and Planning
Applicant |
E Slapp |
Owner |
Eden Fishermen’s Club Pty Ltd |
Site |
Lots 33 & 34 DP505878, Lot 36 DP505879, Lot 6 DP64421, Lot 91 DP709087, Lot 60 DP732500, Lot 5 Sec 2 DP758379, Lot 1 DP1158312 - 215-217 and 221-223 Imlay Street, Eden |
Zone |
B4 Mixed Use Zone and R3 Medium Density Residential |
Site area |
9,975m2 |
Proposed development |
Residential Flat Buildings (86 Units) |
That Council:
1. Assume the concurrence of the Secretary of the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment in accordance with Circular PS 18-003 and pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the Bega Valley Local Environmental Plan 2013 and notify the Department accordingly.
2. Approve the variation to the height of building development standard, specified under Clause 4.3(2) of the Bega Valley Local Environmental Plan 2013.
3. Approve the variation to the minimum site area for residential flat buildings under Clause 4.1(A)(3)(d) of the Bega Valley Local Environmental Plan 2013.
4. Approve development application 2021.376 for Residential Flat Building (86 Units) subject to the conditions of consent provided in Attachment 3.
5. Notify those who made a submission of Council’s decision.
Development application (DA) 2021.376 is being reported to Council for determination as the application seeks to vary the current site density development standard specified by the Bega Valley Local Environmental Plan 2013 (BVLEP 2013).
The reporting of this application to Council for determination is consistent with requirements under Planning Circular PS 18-003 as the variation sought is greater than 10% and Council officers do not have delegation to determine the variation. The proposal also seeks variations to the height.
The proposal has been assessed under Section 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The variation to the height limit is minor and considered reasonable as a landmark site at the southern end of Imlay Street. The variation to the minimum site area is consistent with a Council-endorsed planning proposal to remove this requirement from BVLEP 2013.
The development aligns with the adopted strategic direction that encourages the consolidation of residential land within our town centres, as reinforced in Council’s adopted Local Strategic Planning Statement (LSPS).
The proposed development is recommended for approval, subject to the conditions of consent provided in Attachment 3.
The site is occupied by the Eden Fishermen’s Club building, car parking and open space over multiple allotments. The proposed three residential flat buildings are being considered within the context of the following development:
· DA 2021.103 – Demolition of Eden Fishermen’s Club Building
· DA 2021.120 – 4 Lot Subdivision
· DA 2021.251 – Hotel and Ancillary Uses
· DA 2021.377 – Earthworks and Excavation
The property is located primarily in the B4 Mixed Use Zone at the southern edge of the Eden town centre where height limits were increased from 10m to 16m with the adoption of Bega Valley Development Control Plan 2013 (BVDCP 2013) and BVLEP 2013.
Description of the site
The site (Figure 1) covers an area of 9,975m2 that is occupied by the existing club building, ancillary car parking and open space. The site is relatively flat and cleared of vegetation (Figure 2). The site is surrounded by a mixture of existing commercial and residential land uses including heritage listed properties along Chandos Street to the north. The site itself includes the ‘anchor’ monument that has been integrated into the overall design for the site.
Figure 1 – Locality plan
Figure 2 – View of the site
Description of the proposal
The proposal comprises (Figures 3 and 4 and Attachment 1):
1. Construction of three (3) Residential Flat buildings (86 Units):
a. Building A ‘Grand Marina’ (29 Units)
b. Building B ‘Ocean Breeze’ (28 Units)
c. Building C ‘Polaris’ (29 Units)
Figure 3 – Development footprint
Figure 4 – Development perspective
Planning Assessment
The proposal has been assessed in accordance with the matters for consideration under Section 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (Attachment 2).
Two submissions were received during the notification process raising concern about property values increasing, car parking and the overall size of the proposed development. A further late submission was also received raising a number of concerns including design, impact on the heritage values and variations to existing controls. The issues raised in the submissions are addressed later in this report.
Bega Valley Local Environmental Plan 2013
The development has been assessed in accordance with BVLEP 2013. The land is zoned B4 Mixed Use with a small section of R3 Medium Density Residential Zone (Figure 5). The proposed residential flat buildings consist of three separate buildings and a total of 86 units.
The following definition applies:
residential flat building means a building containing 3 or more dwellings but does not include an attached dwelling or multi dwelling housing.
Height and storeys
A 16-metre height limit currently applies to the site which is measured from “existing ground level” to the highest point of the building. Building height is defined as follows:
Building Height (or height of building) means—
(a) in relation to the height of a building in metres—the vertical distance from ground level (existing) to the highest point of the building, or
(b) in relation to the RL of a building—the vertical distance from the Australian Height Datum to the highest point of the building, including plant and lift overruns, but excluding communication devices, antennae, satellite dishes, masts, flagpoles, chimneys, flues and the like.
The design includes a lift overrun that would encroach above the 16m height limit by 1.6m (Figure 6). A request to vary the height limit has been received from the applicant (Attachment 4).
Figure 5 – Zoning map
Figure 6 – Elevation and height control
Site Density
The proposal is subject to a site density development standard requiring one dwelling per 250m2 under Clause 4.1A(3)(d) of BVLEP2013. Strict compliance with the standard would see a maximum yield of 40 units for the site. That is considered well below the yield that could ordinarily be achieved within a 16m height limit and 9,975m2 site area and well below the 86 units proposed as part of this development application. The applicant has therefore requested a variation from this standard.
Variations under Clause 4.6
The application seeks two variations under Clause 4.6 of BVLEP 2013, being the 16m height limit under Clause 4.3 and site density control under Clause 4.1A(3)(d). The concurrence of the Secretary of the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment can be assumed for both variations, in accordance with the provisions of Planning Circular PS 18-003.
Council, as the consent authority, may consider variations to development standards (with the use of Clause 4.6 of BVLEP 2013) provided the proposal:
· meets the objectives of the zone, and
· meets the objectives of the development standard, and
· demonstrates that compliance with the standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case, and
· demonstrates there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening the development standard.
The applicant has provided justification to variation for the subject site (Attachment 4).
Objectives of the zone
The following objectives apply to the B4 Mixed Use Zone:
· To provide a mixture of compatible land uses.
· To integrate suitable business, office, residential, retail and other development in accessible locations so as to maximise public transport patronage and encourage walking and cycling.
The proposed residential flat buildings are being considered within the context of an overall development for the site that includes a hotel and ancillary uses. The site has been identified for a landmark development and the proposed development achieves this purpose. The development will provide a focal point for the southern end of Imlay Street that will provide for the activation of the town centre with a development that is within walking distance of all facilities within Eden. The variation to the height limit is minimal and the minimum site density controls currently prevent the development potential of the land being fulfilled.
Objectives of the Development Standard
The following objectives apply to Clauses 4.1B and 4.3:
Clause 4.1A - Minimum site areas for dwelling houses, dual occupancies, multi dwelling housing and residential flat buildings in certain zones
(1) The objective of this clause is to achieve planned residential density in certain zones.
Clause 4.3 – Height of Buildings
(1) The objectives of this clause are as follows:
(a) to retain the existing character and landscape of the locality and to encourage a low-set building form,
(b) to protect residential amenity, views, privacy and solar access.
The site is located within a mixed-use area where the impact on residential amenity is reduced due to the boundary setbacks and the prevailing street layout and orientation.
The height limit within this catchment was increased to provide further opportunities for development and the variation to the height control is minimal. The site density controls currently limit the development of this centrally located site contrary to the strategic objectives that encourage the consolidation and further development of residential and commercial land within our town centres.
Whether compliance with the standard is unreasonable or unnecessary
Non-compliance with the height and site density controls is considered acceptable given the variation to the height control is minimal (lift overrun) and the site density controls are subject to a planning proposal to remove this clause to align with the strategic objectives for the Shire.
The variation to the height control does not impact on the residential amenity of surrounding land uses and limiting the number of units would significantly reduce the yield that would ordinarily be achieved within the building envelope for this site.
Whether there are sufficient environmental planning grounds
The site has few environmental constraints with an existing club building, car parking and green space. It provides a rare opportunity to develop a centrally located site that is in the one ownership. The proposed development is well articulated and reflects the maritime history of Eden. The design is divided into three buildings to reduce the overall bulk and scale of the proposed development and provide space for landscaping and solar access.
Development Control Plan 2013
The proposal has been assessed in accordance with BVDCP 2013 and involves a minor variation to the 16m height limit under Clause 2.3.5.2.
Design
The bulk and scale of the development is broken up into three buildings with a landscaped area at the centre. The design incorporates natural elements and a condition included in the draft consent to ensure the colour scheme reflects the coastal location. The balconies are integrated into the overall façade and help to balance the vertical and horizontal elements of each building. Curved lines soften the corners and provide a subtle reference to the coastal setting and maritime history of Eden.
The existing streetscape is a mixture of commercial and historical buildings. Setbacks have been provided to reduce the potential impact on those buildings along Chandos Street.
The height and number of storeys would be a feature within the existing streetscape and a focal point at the southern end of Imlay Street. Within this context the minor variation to the 16m height limit under Clause 2.4.5.2 is considered reasonable.
Amenity
The proposed development site is located on the southern end of the Eden town centre where a commercial use of the site has already been established. The proposal would provide a transition between the more commercial uses fronting Imlay Street and the residential uses to the south and west of the site.
Views
The site contains an existing two storey building and would sit behind the prevailing view corridors of existing residential properties (Figure 7). The impact is considered minor within the context of the view catchment and there are limited opportunities to reduce this impact given the prevailing 16m height control.
Figure 7 – View Catchment
State Environmental Planning Policies
SEPP 65 – Design Quality of Residential Development and the Apartment Design Guide apply to this development application. SEPP 65 applies given it is three storeys or more above ground level and the building contains at least four or more dwellings. A Design Verification Statement that includes a response to the Apartment Design Guide has been provided by the applicant. The development is consistent with Apartment Design Guide, with only a minor variation to the setback of the top storey by less than 1m from the western boundary.
The streetscape is defined by a mixture of commercial and public buildings that vary from single storey to two storeys in height. The proposed five storey development (excluding basement levels) takes advantage of the 16m height limit that was introduced as part of BVLEP 2013 and BVDCP 2013. The development would introduce a new building element into the streetscape in terms of its overall height and scale.
The development has been split into three buildings with green space at the centre and landscaping across the Imlay Street frontage. The proposed development improves the interface with the public domain by establishing the main access point from Chandos Street. The street level design of the proposed development is articulated with sandstone cladding and landscaping. The development would significantly improve the existing amenity of the site and public domain that consists of a deteriorating pavement, access points and a club building adjacent to the front boundary.
Bega Valley Local Strategic Planning Statement
The proposed development is consistent with the following statements within the LSPS:
· The main street commercial area grades away to medium density residential precincts, which capitalise on proximity to the commercial core and capture the magnificent views.
· Develop and implement urban renewal plans to encourage redevelopment that increases the supply and diversity of housing in Bega, Merimbula and Eden.
Residential Land Strategy
The following directions are contained within the Residential Land Strategy 2040:
· More housing diversity is needed in all centres, such as minimum lot sizes, heights and required dwelling mix, would support housing diversity and more growth close to services and facilities.
· The continued viability of commercial centres has important flow-on benefits for the communities that depend on services, employment and economic growth.
· Identify planning controls and incentives such as density or height bonuses that deliver different dwelling types, greater bedroom mix and diversity of tenure.
The development is consistent with these strategic directions that encourage consolidation of residential land to provide accommodation where people can live within walking distance of all amenities and help activate our town centres. The development also provides a mixture of apartment sizes (15x1 bed, 42x2 bed and 29x3 bed) and housing diversity that reflect changing demographics and household size. The additional supply will encourage growth and activation of the commercial town centre of Eden.
Options
The following options are available to Council, in its consideration of this matter:
1. Approve the development application subject to the conditions of consent provided in (Attachment 3). This is the recommended option.
2. Defer consideration of the matter and request a separate report identifying any relevant Section 4.15 matters for consideration and draft reasons for refusal.
3. Defer consideration of the matter and seek an alternative design that complies with the provisions of BVLEP 2013 and BVDCP 2013.
Community and Stakeholder Engagement
Engagement undertaken
The proposed development was notified in accordance with Council’s adopted Community Engagement Strategy from 26 August 2021 until 9 September 2021. Two submissions were received during the notification period and one late submission was received.
The following is a summary of the issues raised in the submissions.
Property Values
Concern has been raised that the development will increase property values and rates.
Staff Comment
The potential for the development to Increase property values and rates is not a consideration for this proposal.
Parking
Staff Comment
A total of 180 car parking spaces and 34 bicycle parking spaces have been provided in accordance with the requirements of BVDCP 2013 as detailed below:
· 14 spaces (1 per 1 bed)
· 144 spaces (2 spaces per 2-3 bed)
· 22 visitor spaces 1 visitor space for every 4 dwellings)
· 34 bicycle spaces (1 per 3 dwellings)
Another 120 car parking spaces have been provided as part of the approved hotel development (2021.251), with a total of 300 car parking spaces proposed for the whole site. This is considered appropriate for a centrally located site within walking distance of the Eden town centre.
Overall Size and scale of the development
Concern has been raised about the overall height and density of the development on a prominent site that will impact on existing single storey buildings in terms of visual amenity and access to daylight.
The site is located on a high ridge with dominance over the Eden township. The existing Eden Fishermen’s Club is two storeys in height similar to neighbouring heritage listed buildings. The building will be visually prominent from Imlay and Calle Calle Streets and heritage focal points around Eden (Hotel Australasia, May MacKillop Hall/ Museum).
It is a box-like design with a contrasting top storey that will further accentuate the height of the buildings form a distance. The 16m height limit is not acceptable with no benefit to the community and those returning visitors to Eden who wish to retain the existing character and charm of this place within a natural environment.
Variations to features of the building such as setbacks, façade articulation and colour choices to neutralise the dominance of the top-storeys could moderate their visual dominance in Eden.
Staff Comment
The height of this site was increased from 10m to 16m under the BVLEP 2013 to encourage further development and the construction of a landmark development. The design includes a minor variation to the height limit to incorporate a lift well and a planning proposal has been prepared to delete the site density controls.
The scale of the development will contrast with the prevailing streetscape. The location of the site and overall land area, being nearly 1ha, does however provide space within and through the development site that reduces the potential impact on the streetscape and overshadowing.
The design has been split into three separate buildings and articulated with natural materials and landscaping to help soften the overall appearance. A colour palette that reflects the natural environment and coastal setting of Eden has also been recommended as a condition of consent to help integrate the buildings into the proposed setting that includes the draft Heritage Conservation Area further to the south.
The proposed building is designed to be a focal point at the end of Imlay Street to connect the wharf precinct of Snug Cove with the Eden Town Centre. The proposed development aligns with the strategic directions contained within the LSPS and Residential Land Strategy that encourages consolidation of land within our town centres.
Design
Good urban design shapes the built environment in the context of social, economic and environmental factors. It will utilise a building site and characteristics of place with effective balance of built forms and space. The elements and principles of good design do not feature in the design statements of this development.
Staff Comment
The design has been split into three separate buildings and articulated with natural materials and landscaping to help soften the overall appearance around the street level. A colour palette that reflects the natural environment and coastal setting of Eden has also been recommended as a condition of consent to help integrate the buildings into the proposed setting that includes the draft Heritage Conservation Area further to the south.
Heritage
The scale and height of these buildings will visually dominate all heritage buildings in the vicinity of the new development. Only three heritage buildings have been considered in the Heritage Impact Statement and the planning proposal for the Eden Conservation Area. A reviewed assessment that includes all heritage buildings is required.
Staff Comment
The development (including both the hotel and residential flat buildings) has been reviewed by Council’s Heritage Advisor and advice has been provided to the applicant to help refine the colour palette. This has been reinforced as a condition of the hotel development (2021.251) and included as a condition of the draft consent for this development (2021.376).
Variations and housing diversity
The proposal involves variations to the height and site density that would double the density for the investment and tourist market creating a monopoly for this dwelling type and not increasing housing diversity or affordability contrary to the intent of the planning proposal to vary the minimum site areas.
Staff Comment
A variety of unit sizes have been incorporated into the design and would contribute to the diversity of housing within Eden and changing household dynamics (15x1 bed, 42x2 bed and 29x3 bed).
Mixed use zoning and opportunities
The Port of Eden – Urban Design Blueprint of Design Principles 2006 encourages active street frontages. The Grand Mariner building is a visual wall of exclusion. Opportunities for retail or commercial activity would link this development proposal more effectively to the main street and create interest for those walking the tourist trail along Imlay Street.
Staff Comment
The proposed development will significantly improve the existing streetscape and frontage with landscaping and sandstone treatments along the lower levels. The Development Application is being considered within the context of a hotel development that includes a range of uses that will help to activate the Imlay Street frontage.
The residential flat buildings will provide residential accommodation that is close to the town centre and will help to active these commercial spaces.
Summary
The proposed development involves the following variations:
· Height (16m height limit under BVLEP 2013 and BVDCP 2013)
· Site Density (limit of one dwelling per 250m2 under BVLEP 2013)
· Setback (minor variation to 8m top floor setback under Apartment Design Guide)
The variations are considered reasonable in the context of the site, surrounding development and the overall strategic directions within the LSPS and Residential Land Strategy.
Engagement planned
No further engagement is planned, other than to advise submitters and the applicant of Council’s determination.
Financial and Resource Considerations
Assessing proposals for development is part of the regular business of Council and resourcing to undertake that function is included in Council’s adopted 2021-22 Budget.
Legal /Policy
The variations to the site density controls under Clause 4.1A and 16m height limit under Clause 4.3 of BVLEP 2013 are considered reasonable and justified on planning merit grounds. The development application has been assessed under assumed concurrence.
Refusal of the development application could be subject to an appeal in the Land and Environment Court, which would have cost impacts to defend Council’s position.
Impacts on Strategic/Operational/Asset Management Plan/Risk
Strategic Alignment
The proposed plans are consistent with the goals outlined in the Community Strategic Plan 2040, in particular Goals 7 and 8:
· Goal 7: Our Shire continues to be a vibrant, enjoyable, safe and affordable place to live.
· Goal 8: Our places retain their character and scale, development is well planned, and a range of goods and services are available within our Shire that met local needs.
Directions 24 and 45 of the South East and Tablelands Regional Plan 2036:
· Direction 24: Deliver greater housing supply and choice.
· Direction 25: Focus housing growth in locations that maximise infrastructure and services.
The proposed development is consistent with Council’s adopted Community Strategic Plan 2040, South East and Tablelands Regional Plan 2036, Residential Land Strategy and LSPS.
Environment and Climate Change
The impacts of the development on the environment and climate change are assessed in Attachment 2. Due diligence protocols have been observed in terms of Aboriginal archaeology. A stormwater concept plan was also provided with the proposal.
Economic
The impacts of the development on the economy are assessed in Attachment 2. The proposed development will contribute to the economy of the Eden area and to the activation of the southern end of the commercial precinct.
Risk
The assessment of development is a core function of Council. There are no material impacts on Council’s operations associated with the proposed residential development. The development will involve upgrades to Council’s transport and drainage networks, which are addressed by conditions of consent.
A geotechnical report has been prepared and soil and water management measures required as a condition of consent to ensure the protection of neighbouring properties during any construction works.
Social / Cultural
The impacts of the development on the community are assessed in Attachment 2. The proposed residential development would provide for the development of a centrally located site at the southern end of the Eden town centre. It will contribute towards the activation of the streetscape and the commercial spaces within Eden as well as providing housing options in the area with a mixture of unit sizes.
1⇩. Proposed Plans
2⇩. Section 4.15 Assessment
3⇩. Proposed Development Consent
4⇩. Clause 4.6 Variation
Council |
6 October 2021 |
11.1 Eden Community Access Centre licence renewal............................................. 140
11.2 Community Hall Maintenance Funding 2021/2022.......................................... 148
11.3 RFT 2021-125 Provision of Beach Lifeguard Services....................................... 154
11.4 Possible exchange of land between Council and the Merimbula RSL Club...... 159
Council 6 October 2021 |
Item 11.1 |
11.1. Eden Community Access Centre licence renewal
The licence agreement for Eden Community Access Centre Incorporated to occupy office space within the Eden Gateway Centre expires on 14 November 2021 and requires renewal.
Director Assets and Operations
1. That Council approve a further three-year licence to Eden Community Access Centre Incorporated for their continued occupation of office space within the Eden Gateway Centre for the commencing annual rental fee of $125 per square metre plus GST per annum increased annually by CPI.
2. That authority be given for the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer to execute the above licence agreement.
Executive Summary
The licence agreement for Eden Community Access Centre Incorporated (ECAC) to occupy office space within the Eden Gateway Centre (Centre) expires on 14 November 2021 and requires renewal.
The Centre is located on Council owned operational land being Lot 1 DP 1037443, therefore in accordance with Council’s Management of Leases and Licences Procedure a short-term licence agreement is permissible.
Background
Council resolved at its Ordinary Meeting of 13 March 2019, when considering the renewal of the licence agreement for ECAC to occupy office space within the Centre as follows:
1. That Council approve a further one-year Licence with a further one-year option to Eden Community Access Centre Incorporated for their continued occupation of office space within the Eden Gateway Centre for the new annual rental fee of $1,343.33, with any further Licence to be for a commencing annual rental fee as proposed in the table below which equates to $2,686.67 for year two.
2. That authority be given for the Mayor and General Manager to execute the above Licence Agreement.
Following the resolution of Council, officers progressed the licence renewal and upon expiry of the first term exercised the option for the further one-year term which is due to expire on 14 November 2021.
A further report was presented to Council’s Ordinary Meeting on 10 June 2020, considering engagement with ECAC on the upgrade of the Eden Library. Council resolved as follows:
That Council:
1. Consider the potential of the Eden Library to provide a library and community hub, as part of the planned upgrade for the Eden Gateway Centre.
2. Engage with the Eden Community Access Centre Inc. as a stakeholder in plans to upgrade the Eden Gateway Centre.
3. Explore opportunities to increase the space available to the Eden Community Access Centre Inc. and/or for shared use of space in the redesign of the Eden Gateway Centre.
4. Consult with other government and non-government organisations to seek their interest in delivering community services from the Eden Gateway Centre.
5. Identify potential funding sources to progress the upgrade of the Eden Gateway Centre, incorporating the Eden Library and a potential community hub.
The Centre is ageing and needs future renewal works in the short to mid-term. Council officers are progressing design works for the Centre within the identified budget taking into consideration Council’s commitment to engage with ECAC. As such, it is recommended that ECAC be offered further tenure in the Centre, rather than conducting a public expression of interest (EOI) process.
Following recent negotiations with ECAC additional space within the Centre has been added to ECAC licence area and ECAC have advised they wish to continue with their occupation of this space for a further three (3) year term.
Options
The options available to Council are:
1. Approve a further three (3) year licence agreement to ECAC for their continued occupation of office space within the Centre for their current annual rental fee of $4,408.33, increased annually by CPI.
2. Carry out an EOI process for the use of the office space within the Centre before issuing further tenure to ECAC and present the results of the EOI process back to Council.
Community and Stakeholder Engagement
Engagement undertaken
Council officers have been liaising with ECAC who have indicated they would like to continue with their occupation of the site for a further three (3) year term.
Engagement planned
Council officers will continue to liaise with ECAC to action any resolution of Council. As Council officers only intend to issue three (3) years tenure, there is no legislative requirement under Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) (LG Act) to carry out further consultation as the land is classified as operational land.
Financial and Resource Considerations
In accordance with Council’s Management of Leases and Licences Procedure, an updated market rental assessment was commissioned by Council in June 2021 which indicates a starting rental figure in the order of $11,818 plus GST per annum, to be increased annually by CPI (All Groups –Sydney). The additional space being occupied by ECAC within the Centre is being charged at the same rate of $125m2 plus GST per annum. In 2019 ECAC submitted a rental rebate application in line with Council’s Rental Assessment and Rebate Procedure and were assessed at receiving a rental rebate of 69% off market rent. Based on this rebate ECAC currently pay $4,408.33 for their occupation of space within the Centre.
Council officer time will be required to arrange execution of the new licence agreement and ongoing management of the licence agreement will also require Council officer resources as required.
Legal /Policy
The Centre is located on Council owned operational land being Lot 1 DP 1037443, therefore in accordance with Council’s Management of Leases and Licences Procedure a short-term licence is permissible.
Council’s Management of Lease and Licence Procedure notes that subject to a resolution of Council and the consideration of factors such as identified community benefit, the applicable licence rental may be rebated by an amount calculated using the method outlined in Schedule 1 of Council’s Rental Assessment and Rebate Procedure.
Impacts on Strategic/Operational/Asset Management Plan/Risk
Strategic Alignment
As outlined in the attached report from Council’s Ordinary Meeting of 10 June 2020, the upgrade of the library and opportunities for co-location with other services is identified in the BVSC Library Strategic Plan 2020-2025. The proposal addresses the following elements of BVSC’s Community Strategic Plan and revised Delivery Program.
Outcome 4: Liveable Places; Goal 4: We have meaningful employment and learning opportunities for people in all stages of life.
Delivery Program 2017-2021 Actions: Expand the provision of services, information and education resources for the community and students in line with the Library Services Strategic Plan.
Environment and Climate Change
There are no environment and climate change matters associated with the proposed licence to ECAC.
Economic
The ECAC business model is based on growing its business services, business administration and support, a business development and incubation hub and training and education programs.
Risk
There are no adverse risks in allowing the office space within the Centre to be occupied by ECAC for a further three (3) year term if the use is authorised by way of a formal licence agreement with an inclusion of the appropriate indemnity and insurance clauses.
Social / Cultural
As outlined in the attached report from Council’s Ordinary Meeting of 10 June 2020, there are a range of potential social benefits to the community of Eden because of ECAC occupation of office space within the Centre. The enhancement of the Centre as a library and community hub will contribute to the social and cultural life of the community. It will provide inclusive community spaces that are well utilised by people of all ages, backgrounds, and abilities across the Shire.
Attachments
1⇩. Council report dated 10 June 2020 - Engagement with Eden Community Access Centre on the Upgrade of the Eden Library
Council |
6 October 2021 |
Item 11.1 - Attachment 1 |
Council report dated 10 June 2020 - Engagement with Eden Community Access Centre on the Upgrade of the Eden Library |
Item 11.2 |
11.2. Community Hall Maintenance Funding 2021/2022
This report presents the recommendations from the Section 355 General Community Halls Committee for the allocation of the hall’s maintenance budget in 2021/2022.
Director Assets and Operations
1. That Council receive and note the report.
2. That Council endorse expenditure from the 2021/2022 halls maintenance budget as outlined in this report.
3. That Council endorses the projects proposed to be carried forward from prior years as outlined in this report.
Executive Summary
There are seventeen (17) community halls across the Shire, fifteen (15) of which are managed by community committees and volunteers with the assistance of Council officers. Council provides an annual budget allocation for maintenance projects at these halls. These funds supplement the ongoing operations and regular maintenance that is funded through hall hire fees and charges.
In 2021/2022 the adopted budget for the maintenance/renewal of community halls is $72,466. Potential maintenance projects have been proposed by individual hall committees after consultation with Council officers. The nominated halls maintenance projects are usually voted and agreed by resolution at a Section 355 General Community Halls Committee (GCHC) quarterly meeting. Due to the NSW Health COVID 19 lock down orders a meeting has not been held since 8 June 2021. A vote was conducted via email by GCHC members, and it was agreed to proceed with the nominated hall maintenance projects as outlined in this report.
Background
In 2020/2021 eleven (11) priority projects were identified for funding as follows:
Hall |
Project |
Amount |
Project amendment |
Status |
Bemboka |
As per MBM Building Assessment report - Removal of external fibre cement cladding and strip back, repair and repaint external roadwork ancillaries. |
$2,000 |
Hall committee reported project already completed in prior years. Change of project to refurbishment of external areas was approved. |
Complete |
Candelo |
Reimburse DA, structural design, fire safety compliance and plumbing fees for new kitchen. |
$5,400 |
Nil |
Complete |
Eden |
Arborist removal and pruning trees $4k. As per MBM Building Assessment Report - External timber Window casement $3.1k. |
$4,000
$3,100 |
Nil
Hall committee reported that external timber window casement not required – no expenditure. Change of project suggested: External sign at front entrance requires updating, request to carry forward $2,000 towards this. |
Complete
Carried Forward Request $2,000 |
Pambula |
Electrical re-wiring cabling to the lights. |
$5,000 |
Delays in LED lights to be upgraded via Green Guys - Environment project. |
Carried Forward Request $5,000 |
Quaama |
Timber floor sanding of stage and door repairs. Repairs of lighting and power points. |
$8,840 |
Nil
Nil |
Complete
Complete |
Rocky Hall |
As per MBM Building Assessment Report - replace internal storeroom door with new frame and door. |
$2,400 |
Building inspection reported that the external supper room door being the main entrance door was beyond repair and required a new frame and door to secure the building rather than repair an internal door. Hall committee requested a change of project which was approved. |
Complete |
Tanja |
As per MBM Building Assessment Report - Replace 50L storage heater. |
$1,500 |
Hall Committee reported that new storage heater was not required. Requested change of Project – repair leak in supper room door. |
Complete |
Tarraganda |
As per MBM Building Assessment Report - External wall replacement of brick piers. |
$5,500 |
Hall committee requested a structural report on building which reported that brick piers were sound but recommended to clean gutters which was done. Total cost $870. Request for contribution of $4,500 towards upgrade of accessible toilets. DA approved. |
Carried Forward Request $4,500 |
Towamba |
Slab/cage for new generator.
Security system.
As per MBM Building Assessment Report - External door repairs $3.5k. |
$5,000
$600
$3,500 |
Nil
Nil
Hall committee reported that the external doors did not need replacing. Requested change of project as listed below: · Repairs to concrete back stairs. Total spend $2,070
· Repairs - vandalism to showers entrance doors. Requesting to carry forward $1,000 towards repairs. |
Complete
Complete
Complete
Carried Forward Request $1,000 |
Wolumla |
Fire Safety compliance - exit emergency lighting. |
$4,268 |
Nil |
Complete |
Wyndham |
As per MBM Building Report - re-seal timber floors. |
$6,000 |
Works scheduled to be completed in December 2021. |
Carried Forward Request $6,000 |
Due to various reasons and the increasing difficulty in securing trades due to the black summer bushfires some of the priority projects listed above have not been delivered to date and have been requested to carry over into this financial year for delivery. Likewise, the Murrah project listed below which was planned in the 2019/2020 financial year has not been completed due to difficulty in securing hard wood timber cladding required to complete the external repairs and is requested to carry over into this financial year for delivery. The following table shows all hall maintenance projects that are requested for carry over into this financial year for delivery.
Hall Maintenance Projects Carry Over Requests from previous years |
||
Hall |
Project |
Amount |
Eden Log Cabin |
New external signage project carried over from 2020/21 |
$2,000 |
Pambula |
Electrical re-wiring carried over from 2020/21 |
$5,000 |
Tarraganda |
Access toilet project carried over from 2020/21 |
$4,500 |
Towamba |
Repairs to vandalism of shower doors carried over from 2020/21 |
$1,000 |
Wyndham |
Sanding and re-seal timber floors carried over from 2020/21 |
$6,000 |
Murrah |
External cladding repairs and painting carried over from 2019/20 |
$9,955 |
|
TOTAL |
$28,455.00 |
The recommendations of the GCHC, for the allocation of the maintenance funding in 2021/2022 financial year are as follows:
Project |
Amount |
|
Bemboka |
New external skillion roof over
solar inverters and |
$5,000 |
Brogo |
1. Re-position water filter for easier access under
building $1,000 |
$2,000 |
Eden Log Cabin |
External repaint of building and interior windows |
$12,400 |
Murrah |
Termite treatment |
$990 |
Nethercote |
Replacement of kitchen external door |
$2,500 |
Quaama |
1. New verandah
roof over kitchen and supper room doors on eastern side of hall $4,950 |
$11,950 |
Rocky Hall |
1. Aluminium mesh for roof gutter $3,000 2. Land survey fees $2,000 |
$5,000 |
Towamba |
Window coverings/blinds for hall |
$5,760 |
Wolumla |
Replace section of eastern skillion roof that has been leaking |
$10,000 |
|
Contingency and responsive maintenance |
$16,866 |
|
TOTAL |
$72,466.00 |
Options
The two primary options available to Council are:
1. Approve the proposed expenditure from the 2021/2022 halls maintenance budget as outlined in this report noting the budget is currently included in the adopted 2021/22 budget.
2. Decline to provide the proposed funding allocation. Noting Council has provided an annual budget allocation for maintenance projects at these halls for many years. These funds supplement the ongoing operations and regular maintenance that is funded through fees and charges. If the recommendation of the GCHC is not approved hall asset deterioration could be a factor. The GCHC rely on this funding to assist them in the ongoing asset maintenance costs for the Shire’s community halls.
Community and Stakeholder Engagement
Engagement undertaken
In preparing these project proposals Council officers met with each GCHC to review and consider the building condition assessment report, Facility Management Plan (FMP), and to discuss the committee’s observations. Potential projects were identified through this process and quotes on works from accredited contractors were sought.
Further project proposals have been received. These will be considered towards the end of the financial year to ensure that all nominated projects have been completed on budget, and that no major unforeseen projects arise.
The nominated hall maintenance projects for 2021/2022 are usually voted by resolution at the GCHC quarterly meeting but due to the NSW Health COVID 19 lock down orders a meeting has not been able to proceed. A vote was conducted by email sent to all the GCHC members on 2 September 2021 with responses on whether they agreed or disagreed with nominated hall maintenance projects being due by 18 September 2021. All committee members responded and voted to agree with the nominated 2021/2022 hall maintenance projects outlined.
Engagement planned
If the recommended action is approved, Council will work with the GCHC members to deliver the projects within Council’s procurement policies and procedures.
Financial and Resource Considerations
The current year allocation towards hall maintenance has already been budgeted for. It is recommended that that the previous years underspend be carried forward to be funded out of reserve as identified in the below table. The carry forward amount is also included in a sperate carry forwards and revotes report in this business paper.
Item |
$ Excl GST |
Expenditure Detail |
|
2021/22 Hall Maintenance Projects |
$72,466 |
Hall Maintenance Projects Carried Over from previous years |
$28,455 |
|
|
Total Expenditure |
$100,921 (sum of all costs) |
|
|
Source of Funds |
|
Buildings and Public Domain Special Variation |
$100,921 |
|
|
Total income available |
$100,921 (total project cost) |
Legal /Policy
The GCHC is appointed under section 355 of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) (LG Act). Section 355(b) and Section 377(1) of the LG Act enables Council to exercise its functions by a committee of Council and to do so conditionally.
The delegated functions of the hall committees are set out in the Community Hall Committee Guidelines. These prescribe the manner the committees must operate within.
Impacts on Strategic/Operational/Asset Management Plan/Risk
Strategic Alignment
The management of Council facilities via committees address the following outcomes in the Bega Valley Community Strategic Plan 2040:
Active and Healthy Communities
Goal 1 - We are co-operative, caring and enjoy a culturally rich community life
Strategy 1 - Collaborate with partners to provide and support opportunities for social interaction, cultural industries, activities and events, and care and services for disadvantaged people.
Council’s adopted Building Asset Management Plan provides the framework for the maintenance and renewal of the facilities. Individual FMP are in place for all community halls.
Environment and Climate Change
There are no negative environmental and climate change impacts associated with the recommendations of this report.
Economic
The recommended maintenance projects have been assessed in terms of priority for each hall, affordability, and achievability. The delivery of these projects assists in the ongoing maintenance and restoration of Council assets.
Risk
The recommended maintenance projects avoid ongoing asset deterioration or mitigate Workplace Health and Safety risks.
Social / Cultural
Community halls play an important role as central points for social and cultural activities in towns and villages across the Shire. Partnerships developed with community members to manage and care for these assets, have multiple benefits, and support community wellbeing.
Attachments
Nil
Council 6 October 2021 |
Item 11.3 |
11.3. RFT 2021-125 Provision of Beach Lifeguard Services
This report provides information and recommendation for the recent tender RFT 2021-125 Provision of Beach Lifeguard Services.
Director Assets and Operations
It is recommended that:
1. Council accept the recommendations outlined in the Confidential attachment.
2. Council accept the tender from <insert> as the preferred supplier for RFT 2021-125 Provision of Beach Lifeguard Services and delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate service provision and contract pricing to meet available funding.
3. Council Endorse the Chief Executive Officer to identify potential supplementary funding sources including through grants to meet the full service cost.
Executive Summary
Surf lifesaving is a specialised service provision that requires specific skills, experience and resources. Council is not in a position to deliver this service internally and has subsequently contracted this service provision to an external provider since 2008.
RFT 2021-125 Provision of Beach Lifeguard Services was publicly advertised on VendorPanel, with one submission received. Details of the tender response are included in the tender assessment panel report, which is a confidential attachment to this report.
It needs to be noted the submitted tender price exceeds the available special rate variation funding for the service provision. As a result, either the proposed services will need to be reduced to meet the available funding or additional funding sources identified to fund the shortfall.
Background
Surf lifesaving services are provided during peak summer holiday season and help to manage hazards and risks for the many beach goers, including residents and visitors, taking advantage of the holiday period and warmer weather.
The service locations include the three surf club sites and five non surf club beaches. The sites are located at Camel Rock (Wallaga Lake), Horseshoe Bay (Bermagui - surf club), Tathra (surf club), Short Point (Merimbula), Bar Beach (Merimbula), Main Beach (Merimbula), Pambula Beach (surf club) and Aslings Beach (Eden).
Due to the scope, nature and duration of these services, it is not an effective use of resources for Council to deliver them with in house staff. Since 2008, Council has contracted this service to an external provider through a public tender process. For the duration of this time, Surf Lifesaving Services Pty Ltd (trading as the Australian Lifeguard Service NSW and ‘ALS’) has been the provider of this service.
Most recently, in November 2017, Surf Lifesaving Services Pty Ltd was awarded a three-year contract to provide Professional Beach Lifeguard Services in the Bega Valley. Council approved two (2) one (1) year extensions to that contract for the 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 summer holiday periods. The expiry of the above contract and extensions requires a new tender to be developed and publicly advertised.
The tender documentation RFT 2021-125 Provision of Beach Lifeguard Services was publicly advertised on Wednesday 25 August 2021 and closed on Friday 3 September 2021. This was due to the limited number of known service providers in the market (two are known of), the specialised nature of service and season timing.
The RFT was viewed by nine organisations, including the two known to directly deliver beach lifeguard services. There were no requests for information submitted (RFI’s) during the tender period.
One submission was received. Details of the tender submission and the panel assessment are included in the attached confidential tender assessment panel report. The tender submission met specification requirements and demonstrated the resources, experience and capability required to deliver the services.
Options
Due to the outcome of tender process, limited service providers in market, specialist nature of the services and Council being unable to deliver service internally there are three options for consideration.
Option 1: Council endorse the contractor that made the tender submission as the preferred supplier for RFT 2021-125 Provision of Beach Lifeguard Services and delegate authority to the CEO to negotiate service provision and contract pricing subject to meet available funding.
Option 2: Council accept the contractor submitted tender price and delegate to the CEO to identify additional sources of funding, such as tourism or economic development contributions, to cover the annual shortfall identified.
Option 3: That Council accept the tender from the preferred supplier for RFT 2021-125 Provision of Beach Lifeguard Services and delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate service provision and contract pricing to meet available funding; and
Council Endorse the Chief Executive Officer to identify potential supplementary funding sources including through grants to meet the full service cost
Community and Stakeholder Engagement
The program is widely known and has been delivered successfully for the last 13 years. The program receives positive feedback by the community and visitors, whilst also offering local employment opportunities for qualified persons over the summer period.
Bega Valley Shire Council adopted a special rate variation (SRV) in 2008-2009 for the purpose of funding various Council assets and services. As part of this SRV, funding is attributed to Ocean Lifeguard services to deliver this annual service. This is identified in Council’s annual financial report, and delivery and operational plans.
Engagement undertaken
Details of the program are communicated through the provision of service information through Council’s website, media releases and social media. This service supports the important contribution provided by the volunteer Surf Life Saving Clubs during the peak holiday period of the year.
Tathra Chamber of Commerce have requested Council support their intention to seek grant funding for the purpose of funding their annual February Lifeguard extension and possible April School Holiday service provision (no Council contribution).
The tender was publicly advertised through Council's online tender platform, VendorPanel.
Engagement planned
Key stakeholders will be informed directly including Far South Coast Lifesaving Branch, surf lifesaving clubs, local police, marine rescue, tourism organisations and chambers of commerce.
The wider community will be informed of the outcome through Council media release, social media and website updates. This will also include communicating relevant information about the service provision closer to the service dates.
Financial and Resource Considerations
The tender price received exceeds the allocated annual SRV amount for this service provision. This cost overrun is related to service provision dates prior to Christmas Day due to gazetted school holidays and changes to current employment award impacting service provider wage costs. There are also ongoing annual operational costs related to the contract management and compliance for the service provision to be accounted for.
As a result, either the scope of the services included in the RFT will need be reduced (i.e. service hrs / days reduced) to meet the funding amount or additional funding sources will need to be identified to fund the shortfall. The funding available through the SRV including in the 2022 FY budget to deliver the service in the RFT is $208,925.
Legal /Policy
The Local Government Act 1993 and Local Government (General) Regulations 2005 applies in relation to the transparent and effective management of the procurement of services and asset by Council. Due to the nature, importance and financial value of this service for the possible six (6) year tender term, a Request for Tender was required to advertise and identify a suitable service provider for RFT 2021-125 Provision of Beach Lifeguard Services. In accordance with Council's financial delegations the tender is reported to Council for determination.
This specification and contract is also aligned to the NSW Office of Local Government’s Practice Note 15: Water Safety.
Impacts on Strategic/Operational/Asset Management Plan/Risk
Strategic Alignment
Beach lifeguard services are an important service to the Bega Valley during the summer school holiday period. They provide supervised beach locations for residents and visitors during this period of peak use where school holidays, water temperature and summer weather are favourable for beach use.
Beach Lifeguard Services are specifically referenced in the Bega Valley Shire Council Community Strategic Plan (CSP) and adopted delivery programs and operational plans.
Community Strategic Plan Goal 7: Our Shire continues to be a vibrant, enjoyable, safe and affordable place to live.
Delivery Plan 2017-2022, 4.7.1: Improve Safety for residents and tourists on the Shire’s beaches.
Operational Plan 2021-2022, 4.7.1.1: Review Summer Beach Lifeguard contract including implementing recommendation from the lifesaving provider’s annual report where funding permits.
The service specification for this directly relates to the Delivery Plan Action Implement recommendations from the annual report of lifeguard service providers (where funding is available). Specifically, the services included previous coastal safety recommendations to see each of the eight sites have a lifeguard service effective from the commencement to completion of Summer school holidays.
Environment and Climate Change
Due to the nature and short duration (6 weeks), it is not perceived there will any detrimental environmental impacts from the delivery of services.
Where applicable, Surf Lifesaving Services Pty Ltd have an accredited ISO14001:2015 Environmental Management Plan. This includes a commitment to reviewing the environmental impact of their operations, services and to minimise our environmental footprint.
Economic
As well as being a risk management program, the Summer Beach Lifeguard service also contributes significantly to the Bega Valley economy and tourism. The program supports tourism by promoting a supervised and safer beach locations during the summer holiday period, which relate to local accommodation providers, local hospitality, retail and service-based businesses.
The service provides employment and training opportunities for residents, whilst also supporting the valuable community contribution of our local volunteer Surf Lifesaving Clubs and members.
Risk
The beach lifeguard services are fundamentally a risk management program which is provided to locals and visitors to safely enjoy the most popular beaches in the shire, during the peak summer holiday period.
Lifeguard services help to minimise and control risks in the beach environment through risk assessment, public education, signage, provision rescue equipment and emergency response at identified service locations.
This service provides beach users an option of a supervised location to visit the beach, as opposed higher risk unsupervised locations. This is important during the peak holiday period, where there are increased levels of beach visitation to service locations, including by those who are unfamiliar with the location, environmental factors and site conditions.
The preferred tenderer demonstrated strong experience and capability in their tender. They are considered low risk.
Social / Cultural
Surf lifesaving is important element of Australia’s culture and identity. The iconic red and yellow flags and uniforms are not only recognised in Australia, but also internationally. The flags indicate that the area is being supervised and that there are trained and competent people available to assist if required.
As well as supervising and assisting people in difficulty, Lifeguards provide an important educational service for beach visitors. They communicate safety and environmental information, help visitors to understand to improve their knowledge and understanding of both the local and wider ocean environment.
Beaches are popular social locations during summer holidays where friends, families, visitors all visit to socialise, relax and for recreational activities. This service provides a safe and supervised location where these activities can occur.
Attachments
1. Confidential Memorandum to Councillors- RFT 2021-125 Provision of Beach Lifeguard Services (Confidential - As this attachment contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret as per Section 10A(2)(d) of the Local Government Act 1993.
Although the above relates more explicitly to the discussion of closed business, it also forms part of the basis of justification as to why information relied upon in informing the public decisions made by Council are kept confidential. To consider this confidential material in open Council would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest (as defined in Section 14 of Government Information Public Access (GIPA) Act 2009) as it would potentially disclose private business information provided by tenderers in a confidential tender process and would also impact Council’s position in relation to its consideration, therefore impacting the tender process. This meets the requirements of Sect 10 D of the Local Government Act 1993 if Council were to close the meeting to discuss the details of individual tenderers.
Council 6 October 2021 |
Item 11.4 |
11.4. Possible exchange of land between Council and the Merimbula RSL Club
Merimbula RSL have re-approached Council about the possibility of exploring options relating to land owned by council adjacent to the RSL Club.
Director Assets and Operations
It is recommended that:
1. Council endorses the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate with the Merimbula RSL arrangements that would need to be in place to ensure that there is no reduction in public parking availability and no additional car parking liability to Council whilst delivering an appropriate financial return to Council should Council consider selling all or part of Lot 2 DP 1090625 Alice Street in Merimbula in the future.
2. A further report presenting options to Council be prepared following negotiations.
Executive Summary
At the 13 March 2019 ordinary meeting of Council, Council considered a report in relation to ‘Land Divestment Options - Lot 2 DP 1090625 Alice Street, Merimbula’ along with reports on a number of other parcels of land.
At the time Council resolved:
… ‘That Council resolve to retain the property for car parking purposes and look at future development opportunities.’
Council has now been re-approached by the Merimbula RSL Club seeking for Council to reconsider its position and explore options to allow development of the site whilst also retaining carparking.
Background
At the 13 March 2019 ordinary meeting of Council, Council considered a report in relation to ‘Land Divestment Options - Lot 2 DP 1090625 Alice Street, Merimbula’. At the time Council resolved to retain the property.
Council has now been re-approached by the club seeking to explore options to allow for potential development of the site whilst acknowledging the importance of retaining parking.
A copy of the 13 March 2019 report is attached to this report along with the most recent correspondence from the club. The original correspondence from the club (2018.03.16) with the attachment referred to in the letter is included as a confidential attachment with the confidential staff memo that was attached to the report of 13 March 2019.
Options
Essentially there are two options associated with this report, resolve to retain ownership of the land referred to or alternatively further explore options associated with the land.
Community and Stakeholder Engagement
There has been limited broader stakeholder engagement associated with the report. The Mayor and Acting CEO recently met with the Club and their planning consultant at the Club’s request.
Engagement undertaken
There has been limited broader stakeholder engagement.
Engagement planned
There is no further engagement planned at this time.
Financial and Resource Considerations
At this stage there is no direct financial cost associated with this report other than staff time should Council resolve to undertake further options assessments with the Club.
Legal /Policy
In accordance with Council’s Financial Strategy, Council may use existing land holdings to leverage investment or strategic outcomes. Whilst this may include divestment of vacant Operational Land to generate returns and enable investment in infrastructure etc. it also means considering the significant natural environment and development potential of each land parcel prior to determining its suitability for divestment.
Impacts on Strategic/Operational/Asset Management Plan/Risk
Strategic Alignment
The review of Council’s vacant land portfolio contributes to improving and streamlining Council’s asset management approach.
Environment and Climate Change
At this stage there are limited environment and climate change impacts noting that any potential future development on the site would need to comply with relevant planning controls.
Economic
Should Council consider options associated with potential development of the site it is anticipated additional economic activity would be generated both during and after construction.
Risk
There are no Risks associated with this report.
Social / Cultural
There are no Social / Cultural impacts associated with this report.
Attachments
1⇩. 2019.03.13 Council Report no 12.43 Land Divestment Options - lot 2 dp 1090625 Alice Street Merimbula
2⇩. 2021.09.23 Letter to Council from Merimbula RSL Club
3⇩. 2018.03.16 Letter to Council from Merimbula RSL Club
4. 2019.03.13 Confidential Memo Alice Street carpark purchase proposal (Confidential - As this attachment contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret as per Section 10A(2)(d) of the Local Government Act 1993.
Although the above relates more explicitly to the discussion of closed business, it also forms part of the basis of justification as to why information relied upon in informing the public decisions made by Council are kept confidential. To consider this confidential material in open Council would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest (as defined in Section 14 of Government Information Public Access (GIPA) Act 2009). This meets the requirements of Sect 10 D of the Local Government Act 1993 if Council were to close the meeting to discuss the details of the commercial information.
5. Confidential Attachment - April 2018 - Submission to Bega Valley Shire Council (Confidential - As this attachment contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade secret as per Section 10A(2)(d) of the Local Government Act 1993.
Although the above relates more explicitly to the discussion of closed business, it also forms part of the basis of justification as to why information relied upon in informing the public decisions made by Council are kept confidential. To consider this confidential material in open Council would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest (as defined in Section 14 of Government Information Public Access (GIPA) Act 2009). This meets the requirements of Sect 10 D of the Local Government Act 1993 if Council were to close the meeting to discuss the details of the commercial information.
Council |
6 October 2021 |
Item 11.4 - Attachment 1 |
2019.03.13 Council Report no 12.43 Land Divestment Options - lot 2 dp 1090625 Alice Street Merimbula |
6 October 2021 |
|
Item 11.4 - Attachment 2 |
2021.09.23 Letter to Council from Merimbula RSL Club |
Council |
6 October 2021 |
Item 11.4 - Attachment 3 |
2018.03.16 Letter to Council from Merimbula RSL Club |
Council |
6 October 2021 |
13.1 Carry Forwards and Revotes at End of Financial Year 2021............................. 168
Council 6 October 2021 |
Item 13.1 |
13.1. Carry Forwards and Revotes at End of Financial Year 2021
At the close of each financial year (FY) Council is required to consider the revote requests from FY2021 budget to the FY2022 budget. This report also advises of budgets to be carried forward.
Director Business & Governance
That Council:
1. Receive and note the Financial Year 2021 carry forward projects and;
2. Resolves to revote the budget allocation for projects not commenced contained in this report. The allocation is to be moved from the FY2021 budget and applied to the corresponding budget in FY2022.
Executive Summary
This report formalises the request for carry forwards and revotes from the 2021 budget, to the 2022 budget, before the final sign off on the 2021 financial statements. The recommendation is based on projects that are works in progress, commenced works or priority projects that were not started in FY2021. The recommendation is particularly based on projects that are funded by external grants.
Background
Every year Council will have a range of programs that are not completed for a variety of reasons. At the end of the financial year Council considers the revotes and carry forwards of budget from the year ending and resolves on bringing the budget allocation into the current year.
FY2021 saw Council continue to operate in a changing environment. The majority of projects planned by Council have been delivered however, some have been delayed and this report outlines the need to carry forward allocations against those delayed projects.
Funding continued to be provided to Council in the year that was not formally included in the operational plan and budget adopted in June 2020. Some of the allocations for projects were received due to bushfire and COVID recovery, some of this funding was allocated late in the financial year. Timing and resources have resulted in some projects planned for FY2021 to be reconsidered as a carry forward or revote project in to 2022 Financial Year.
· A carry forward is where any eligible programs or projects have commenced and are a work in progress at the end of the financial year. This does not require a revote and budgeted funds will not lapse. Expenditure can continue until any decision is made to cease the program or project.
· A revote is when an eligible program or project has not commenced by the end of the financial year. This means the budget allocation has lapsed. Council is required to decide whether the revote of the budget is approved.
A table of the project carry forwards, revotes and the funding source (external grant, revenue, other) is detailed in this report. Several items relate directly to funding received in 2021 that is required to be allocated over two or more years.
The clear priority is to prepare plans and budgets and deliver the works included in them. In the current climate we are seeing extensive funding to local government from State and Federal Government occurring outside of a “neat” budget cycle where grants are applied for and accepted within a financial year. The Quarterly Budget Review Statements are reported to Council to identify these movements throughout the year.
In FY2021, significant impacts from operating in a bushfire recovery and rebuilding phase and the additional impacts of COVID has seen some reprioritising of Council activities and delay in some project delivery.
When adopted the carry forwards and revotes will be available for staff to complete the works.
Options
1. That Council resolve on the recommended revotes and carry forwards.
2. Council amend the attached list of carry forwards and revotes.
Community Engagement
There is no formal community engagement planned as a result of this recommendation to Council. Projects undertaken have their own community engagement plan throughout development and delivery.
Financial and resource considerations
The recommended carry forwards and revotes included in this report have been closely considered and it is considered reasonable to expect that they can be achieved in FY2022 year. The impact may be that activities budgeted in FY2022 are delayed, or staged, and the quarterly budget review reports to Council will include consideration of these impacts as they become known.
Summary by fund
Funds |
Amount |
Funding Source Revenue Grants Other |
||
GENERAL FUND |
||||
Operational Revotes |
$99,000 |
$99,000 |
|
|
Operational Carryover |
$4,121,959 |
$212,103 |
$3,251,767 |
$658,089 |
Capital Revotes |
$357,050 |
$32,000 |
$205,560 |
$119,490 |
Capital Carryover |
$16,501,767 |
$1,101,739 |
$7,175,168 |
$8,224,860 |
TOTAL GENERAL FUND |
$21,079,776 |
$1,444,842 |
$10,632,495 |
$9,002,439 |
WATER FUND |
||||
Operational -Carryover |
$24,682 |
$24,682 |
|
|
Capital Carryover |
$2,755,698 |
$2,755,698 |
|
|
TOTAL WATER FUND |
$2,780,380 |
$2,780,380 |
|
|
SEWER FUND |
||||
Operational Carryover |
$24,682 |
$24,682 |
|
|
Capital Revotes |
$51,000 |
$51,000 |
|
|
Capital Carryover |
$5,585,541 |
$5,585,541 |
|
|
TOTAL SEWER FUND |
$5,661,223 |
$5,661,223 |
|
|
Carry Forwards - Operational
Project |
Amount |
Funding Source Revenue Grants Other |
Reserve/Detail |
||
BANDARA CHILDCARE |
|||||
Long Day Care Professional Development |
$3,995 |
$3,995 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
||
Start Strong Pathways |
$43,300 |
$43,300 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
||
BIOSECURITY |
|||||
Giant Parramatta Grass project |
$15,170 |
$15,170 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
||
SEWAP Variation Fire Recovery project |
$15,307 |
$15,307 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
||
LLS Post Fire Weed grant |
$4,492 |
|
|
$4,492 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
COMMUNICATIONS AND EVENTS |
|||||
Website Maintenance and Development |
$18,507 |
$18,507 |
|
|
Consultant engaged in FY21 |
Events and Festivals |
$5,776 |
$5,776 |
|
|
|
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT |
|||||
Reconciliation Week event |
$2,810 |
|
|
$2,810 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
Community Recovery through Greening |
$40,418 |
|
$40,718 |
|
BCRRF Funded |
COMMUNITY HALLS |
|||||
Hall Maintenance Budget |
$28,455 |
$28,455 |
|
|
Funds for projects allocated to Halls committees that have been delayed |
Candelo Hall Repairs to external Drainage |
$67,238 |
|
|
$67,238 |
CRIF Funded |
ROADS – DRFA funds |
|||||
Roads Rural Sealed Roads – DRFA Projects |
$89,800 |
|
$89,800 |
|
DRFA funded projects |
Roads Rural Unsealed Roads – DRFA Projects |
$3,063,218 |
|
$3,063,218 |
|
DRFA funded projects |
Roads Urban Sealed Roads – DRFA Projects |
$39,216 |
|
$39,216 |
|
DRFA Funded Projects |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT |
|||||
Bega Valley bushfire economic recovery and coordination phase 1 |
$96,520 |
|
|
$96,520 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
BCRRF Stream 1 Business Projects |
$34,063 |
|
|
$34,063 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
Accredited Training for Small business |
$17,189 |
|
|
$17,189 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
EDEN CHILDCARE |
|||||
Community grant Hub |
$39,824 |
|
|
$39,824 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
Start Strong Pathways |
$102,853 |
|
|
$102,853 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY |
|||||
Green Shoots – Tathra Community |
$8,639 |
|
|
$ 8,639 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
Coastal Management – Scoping Project |
$43,535 |
|
$3,535 |
$40,000 |
E-Levy Reserve |
FINANCE SERVICES |
|||||
Finance Services – Software costs |
$120,000 |
$120,000 |
|
|
BIS reporting and Accounts payable workflow project commenced in FY21 |
INDIGENOUS ADVANCEMENT STRATEGY |
|||||
Indigenous advancement strategy |
$154,182 |
|
|
$154,182 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
LIBRARY |
|||||
Library Projects |
$6,191 |
|
$1,000 |
$5,191 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
Senior Isolations grant |
$14,280 |
|
$14,280 |
|
|
PLANNING SERVICES |
|||||
Planning Services Legal Fees |
$26,605 |
$26,605 |
|
|
Continuation of 2 ongoing legal matters |
Development Assessment Service Review |
$10,260 |
$10,260 |
|
|
Consultant engaged prior in FY21 |
REGIONAL GALLERY |
|||||
Create NSW Project Grant |
$7,316 |
|
|
$7,316 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
BEGA VALLEY REGIONAL LEARNING CENTRE |
|||||
Valuation Costs |
$2,500 |
$2,500 |
|
|
Consultant engaged in FY21 |
WATER FUND |
|||||
Water Cultural Heritage Assessment |
$24,682 |
$24,682 |
|
|
Consultant engaged in FY21 |
SEWER FUND |
|||||
Sewer Cultural Heritage Assessment |
$24,682 |
$24,682 |
|
|
Consultant engaged in FY21 |
Total Operational Revotes |
$4,171,323 |
$261,467 |
$3,251,767 |
$658,089 |
|
Carry Forwards - Capital
Project |
Amount |
Funding Source Revenue Grants Other |
Reserve/Detail |
|
|||
ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS |
|
||||||
Tathra Beach Kiosk. |
$175,000 |
|
$120,238 |
$54,762 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Safer Country Grant for Admin Buildings |
-$24,081 |
|
|
-$24,081 |
More work completed in FY21 than anticipated |
|
|
ANIMAL CONTROL |
|
||||||
Wallagoot Pound fence |
$4,252 |
|
|
$4,252 |
Asset Reserve |
|
|
BRIDGES |
|
||||||
Murrabrine Cr Bridge |
$2,442,209 |
|
|
$2,442,209 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Pretty Point Bridge Renewal |
$394,565 |
|
$394,565 |
|
|
|
|
Nelsons Ck Bridge Guardrail connections |
$81,000 |
|
|
$81,000 |
Reserve Asset Replacement |
|
|
Tathra Bermagui Rd ARMCO, Replace with Box Culvert |
$2,312 |
|
|
$2,312 |
Reserve Asset Replacement |
|
|
Whipstick Ck Mount Darragh Rd, abuts & piles |
$489,461 |
|
|
$489,461 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Cuttagee Bridge–Design /Scope |
$187,223 |
|
|
$187,223 |
Developer Contributions S7.11 Roads |
|
|
Cobargo Bermagui Rd, repair bridge |
$82,425 |
|
|
$82,425 |
Reserve Asset Replacement |
|
|
Berrambool Foot bridge |
$318,208 |
|
$175,000 |
$143,208 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
The Snake Track (3.87) - DRFA Funding |
$231,714 |
|
$231,714 |
|
|
|
|
The Snake Track (5.40) - DRFA Funding |
$116,169 |
|
$116,169 |
|
|
|
|
Tarlintons Lane causeway, Renew Deck and Seal Approaches |
$4,082 |
|
|
$4,082 |
Reserve Asset Replacement |
|
|
Buckajo Rd, concrete abuts A&B piers |
$69,898 |
|
|
$69,898 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Nungatta Rd, replace with box culvert |
$147,157 |
$49,062 |
$85,000 |
$13,095 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Logans Bridge, Pericoe Rd - FCB renewal |
$85,139 |
|
$51,250 |
$33,889 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Garfields Rd Bridge- Johnston Ck |
$97,284 |
|
$50,000 |
$47,284 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Meringola Gully Bridge, Garfields Road, Buckajo - FCB Project |
$67,500 |
|
|
$67,500 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
PERICOE ROAD - Pericoe Creek - DRFA Funding - |
$784,000 |
|
$784,000 |
|
|
|
|
Saddle Camp Creek - Barrets Rd Bemboka |
$85,290 |
$13,040 |
$72,250 |
|
|
|
|
CEMETERIES |
|
||||||
Pambula Cemetery fencing replacement - LRCI P2 Program |
$62,200 |
|
$31,100 |
$31,100 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
CEP COORDINATION |
|
||||||
Field Based Tablets & Comms |
$48,234 |
$48,234 |
|
|
Delay in project rollout |
|
|
COMMUNITY HALLS |
|
||||||
Halls Fire Safety Upgrade |
$11,717 |
|
|
$11,717 |
Reserve Public Buildings |
|
|
Tanja Hall -driveway, carpark & safety improvements - LRCI P2 Program |
$207,300 |
|
$103,650 |
$103,650 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Wandella Hall Rebuild (2020 Bushfire Rebuild) |
$188,709 |
|
|
$188,709 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
CYCLEWAYS NOT ON ROAD RESERVE |
|
||||||
Cycleway kerb upgrade Bega St Tathra |
$58,888 |
|
$58,888 |
|
|
|
|
DRAINAGE |
|
||||||
Drainage improvements at Long Point Merimbula |
$5,679 |
$5,679 |
|
|
Works incomplete in FY21 or delayed |
|
|
Gowings Avenue Drainage |
$216,261 |
$216,261 |
|
|
Works incomplete in FY21 or delayed |
|
|
LAWS DRIVE adjacent Bandara |
$108,646 |
$108,646 |
|
|
Works incomplete in FY21 or delayed |
|
|
Mecklenberg Street Drainage improvements |
$46,897 |
$46,897 |
|
|
Works incomplete in FY21 or delayed |
|
|
Reservoir Street Eden drainage improvements |
$4,028 |
$4,028 |
|
|
Works incomplete in FY21 or delayed |
|
|
Short St Drainage works |
$26,837 |
$26,837 |
|
|
Works incomplete in FY21 or delayed |
|
|
Upper St relining of Pipe |
$5,500 |
$5,500 |
|
|
Works incomplete in FY21 or delayed |
|
|
FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES |
|
||||||
RFS - Bermagui upgrade (Amenities & Kitchen) |
$248,000 |
|
$248,000 |
|
Works delayed |
|
|
RFS - Towamba Extension (Facilities & Meeting Room) |
$198,000 |
|
$198,000 |
|
Works delayed |
|
|
FLEET |
|
||||||
Purchase and Sale of Fleet Asset |
$559,944 |
$559,944 |
|
|
Delivery Delayed from FY21 |
|
|
LIBRARY SERVICES |
|
||||||
Bermagui Makerspace |
$191,600 |
|
|
$191,600 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Tura Library - Design for Lower Level |
$20,909 |
|
|
$20,909 |
Reserve Community Facilities |
|
|
MERIMBULA AIRPORT |
|
||||||
Merimbula Airport General Aviation Precinct - Regional Airport Grant |
-$61,423 |
|
|
-$61,423 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants Adjustment |
|
|
Merimbula Airport Runway Extension - Restart NSW Airport Grant |
$139,259 |
|
$139,259 |
|
|
|
|
Merimbula Airport Runway Overlay |
$763 |
|
|
$763 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
PARKS AND GARDENS |
|
||||||
Short Point Coastal Accessibility Project Works |
$878,106 |
|
$848,356 |
$29,750 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Bruce Steer Pool Coastal Accessibility Project Works |
$171,338 |
|
|
$171,338 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Eden Inclusive Playspace |
$27,638 |
|
-$250,000 |
277,638 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Pambula Beach Coastal Accessibility Project Works |
$202,905 |
|
$128,000 |
$74,905 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Quaama Playground |
$-5,764 |
|
|
-$5,764 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants Adjustment |
|
|
Rural Village Playground Upgrades (Mogareeka, Bemboka, Wyndham and |
$3,591 |
|
|
$3,591 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Tura Head Coastal Reserves - Walking Tracks and Beach Access |
$192,920 |
|
$90,920 |
$102,000 |
Reserves recreation SV |
|
|
PUBLIC AMENITIES |
|
||||||
Apex Park Cobargo new toilet block LRCI P2 Funding |
$162,200 |
|
$82,950 |
$79,250 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Colombo Park Bemboka inclusive parkland and accessibility improvements |
$279,920 |
|
$139,960 |
$139,960 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
REGIONAL GALLERY |
|
||||||
Bega Valley Regional Gallery Upgrade |
$197,996 |
|
$197,996 |
|
|
|
|
ROADS RURAL SEALED LOCAL |
|
||||||
Boydtown Park Rd, Retaining Wall |
$17,611 |
$17,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
Blackfellow Lake Road, Roads & Tracks Project |
$65,126 |
|
|
$65,126 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Newtown Rd Bega Safer Roads |
$18,000 |
|
$18,000 |
|
|
|
|
ROADS RURAL SEALED REGIONAL |
|
||||||
Candelo Bega Road to Princess Hway intersection |
$168,000 |
|
$168,000 |
|
|
|
|
Mogilla RD, Snowy Mt Highway to Candelo |
$150,000 |
|
$150,000 |
|
|
|
|
Sapphire Coast Drive - Road Safety Improvements Blackspot |
$94,785 |
|
$94,785 |
|
|
|
|
Tathra Road Guardrail renewal Blackspot |
$180,000 |
|
$180,000 |
|
|
|
|
ROADS RURAL UNSEALED LOCAL |
|
||||||
Dr George Mt Road - Pavement Upgrade |
$340,424 |
|
$340,424 |
|
|
|
|
Whittles Road - Road & Tracks Project LLS |
$175,894 |
|
$128,026 |
$47,868 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
ROADS URBAN SEALED LOCAL |
|
||||||
Bus Bay Upgrade - Tanja Public School CPTIGS |
$252,083 |
|
$243,915 |
$8,168 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Urban Local Roads Reseals |
$35,318 |
|
|
$35,318 |
Developer Contributions 7.12 |
|
|
Eden Port to Highway - High Productivity Freight Link |
$1,051,676 |
|
$1,051,676 |
|
|
|
|
Ginn St [Bermagui] |
$20,000 |
|
|
$20,000 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Kirkland Ave guardrail renewal |
$25,000 |
|
|
$25,000 |
Reserves Asset Management |
|
|
Rawlinson street Stabilisation |
$286,311 |
|
|
$286,311 |
Reserves Road Stabilisation SV |
|
|
Towamba Burragate Road Upgrades |
$1,570,249 |
|
|
$1,570,249 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Wonboyn Road / Adelaide Avenue intersection |
$21,216 |
|
|
$21,216 |
Reserves Asset Management |
|
|
ROADS URBAN SEALED REGIONAL |
|
||||||
Bega Street, Tathra Kerb & Gutter |
$109,020 |
|
|
$109,020 |
Reserves Asset Management |
|
|
East St (50-1) Ch:690 |
$36,471 |
|
|
$36,471 |
Reserves Asset Management |
|
|
Eden Port Heavy Vehicle Route |
$242,017 |
|
|
$242,017 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
SPORTING GROUNDS AND FACILITIES |
|
||||||
Barclay Street Sportsground Revitalisation |
$5,937 |
|
|
$5,937 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Bega Sporting Complex Upgrade |
$154,575 |
|
$54,000 |
$100,575 |
Reserves recreation SV |
|
|
Bermagui Multiuse Courts |
$410 |
|
|
$410 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
BVSC Skateparks [Eden] |
$31,301 |
|
|
$31,301 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Pambula Sporting Complex Showground Improvements |
$218,550 |
|
$36,920 |
$181,630 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Tathra Lawrence Park Floodlighting, playground and carparking |
$62,166 |
|
|
$62,166 |
$6,313 Reserves Asset Management $55,853 Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Towamba Fencing replacement LRCI P2 |
$57,000 |
|
$28,500 |
$28,500 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
TOWN CENTRE CARPARKS |
|
||||||
Aslings Beach carpark upgrade - LRCI P2 Program |
$309,906 |
|
$155,000 |
154,906 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Bega Plumb Motors Carpark Upgrade [Bega] |
$238,649 |
|
$238,649 |
|
|
|
|
WHARVES, JETTIES & BOATRAMPS |
|
||||||
Bermagui Harbour Boat Ramp Facility Upgrade |
$33,281 |
|
$33,008 |
$273 |
Reserves recreation SV |
|
|
Quarantine Bay Pontoon Upgrade |
$13,177 |
|
|
$13,177 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
Bermagui River Boat Ramp Upgrade |
$157,000 |
|
$157,000 |
|
|
|
|
Pambula Lake Boat Ramp Facility Upgrade, Broadwater |
$-10,471 |
|
|
$-10,471 |
Reserves recreation SV - Adjustment |
|
|
Tathra Wharf Upgrade |
$131,480 |
|
|
$131,480 |
Contract Liability – Prepaid grants |
|
|
WATER SUPPLIES |
|
||||||
Bega Groundwater Hydrology Project |
$57,000 |
$57,000 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Bega Water Treatment Plant |
$397,575 |
$397,575 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Bemboka Water Filtration Plant |
$15,265 |
$15,265 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Brogo Balance Tank 2 Bypass |
$140,000 |
$140,000 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Brogo Water Treatment Plant (WTP) |
$858,988 |
$858,988 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Clear Scada Water - Eden |
$67,330 |
$67,330 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Clear Scada Water - Radio B/b |
$20,370 |
$20,370 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Cobargo Narira Creek Bridge WM Crossing |
$107,200 |
$107,200 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Couria Creek priority process upgrades |
$42,000 |
$42,000 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Pambula - Fishpen Merimbula Water Main Link |
$350,295 |
$350,295 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Rawlinson Street watermain renewal |
$99,300 |
$99,300 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Solar - Water Sites |
$39,800 |
$39,800 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Strathmore Crescent Watermain Renewal |
$12,300 |
$12,300 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Tathra and Trig Reservoir Reconfiguration |
$83,200 |
$83,200 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Wallagoa Lake Road Watermain Renewal |
$145,075 |
$145,075 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Yellow Pinch Water Treatment Plant (WTP) |
$320,000 |
$320,000 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
SEWER SERVICES |
|
SEWER SERVICES |
|||||
Asset & Maintenance Management System |
$69,700 |
$69,700 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Bega STP Decanter actuator |
$69,700 |
$69,700 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Bermagui STP upgrade |
$2,013,767 |
$2,013,767 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Central Package SPS Renewals |
$11,930 |
$11,930 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Clear Scada Sewer - Various |
$309,520 |
$309,520 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
MBR STP Compressor Replacement Package |
$66,000 |
$66,000 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Merimbula STP Septic Receival Area |
$39,700 |
$39,700 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
New Pressure sewer |
$34,475 |
$34,475 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Scada Telemetry Renew - Radio B/bone |
$70,600 |
$70,600 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Sewer - Solar Installations |
$794,000 |
$794,000 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Sewer Network Renewals |
$169,386 |
$169,386 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Sewer pipes renewals |
$39,303 |
$39,303 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Merimbula Sewer Pump Station Renewals (1) |
$250,880 |
$250,880 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Merimbula Sewer Pump Station Renewals (2) |
$72,270 |
$72,270 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
South Bega Sewerage |
$717,560 |
$717,560 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Southern Sewer Pump Station Renewals |
$29,000 |
$29,000 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Tathra Drying Bed Reconstruction |
$800,000 |
$800,000 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Tathra STP sludge lagoon 1 liner replacement |
$27,750 |
$27,750 |
|
|
Projects underway |
|
|
Total Carryover - Capital |
$24,843,006 |
$9,442,978 |
$7,715,168 |
$8,224,860 |
|
|
Revotes - Operational
Project |
Carryover |
Funding Source Revenue Grants Other |
Reserve/Detail |
||
BEGA VALLEY CIVIC CENTRE |
|||||
BVCCC Website development |
$6,000 |
$6,000 |
|
|
Delayed awaiting finalisation of Strategy |
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT |
|||||
Social Issues |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
|
|
DIAP, Review of Community Services |
Staff Accommodation |
$41,400 |
$41,400 |
|
|
Establishment/set up and signage – Gipps Street Office |
STRATEGIC PLANNNG |
|||||
Aboriginal Cultural Planning |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
|
|
Funding for anniversary of MOU with the Bega, Eden and Merrimans LALCs |
WHS AND WELLBEING |
|||||
Health and Safety Representative training |
$4,500 |
$4,500 |
|
|
Training delayed due to COVID |
Manual Handling |
$22,000 |
$22,000 |
|
|
Compliance training as per WHS internal Audit recommendations |
Asbestos Identification training |
$6,000 |
$6,000 |
|
|
Compliance based training |
Revotes Operational totals |
$99,900 |
$99,900 |
|
|
|
Revotes - Capital
Project |
Carryover |
Funding Source Revenue Grants Other |
Reserve/Detail |
||
BRIDGES |
|||||
Candelo/Wolumla Apply waterproofing and AC |
$60,000 |
|
|
$60,000 |
Developer Contributions S.7.12 |
Fourters Rd Causeway Rock scour protection |
$15,000 |
|
|
$15,000 |
Reserves Asset Management |
DRAINAGE |
|||||
Sattler St drainage renewal |
$5,000 |
$5,000 |
|
|
Delayed due to change of scope |
PROPERTY SERVICES |
|||||
Nariria Village Complex |
$5,000 |
$5,000 |
|
|
Potential sale delayed |
ROADS RURAL SEALED LOCAL |
|||||
New Buildings Rd Pipe Replace guardrail |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
|
|
Works delayed |
ROADS RURAL SEALED REGIONAL |
|||||
Cobargo Bermagui Rd Box Culvert replace Guardrail |
$30,000 |
|
$30,000 |
|
Works delayed |
Cobargo Bermagui Rd, Black Cr, Pipe Rock protection |
$30,000 |
|
$30,000 |
|
Works delayed |
Pipe Culvert, Repair scouring |
$20,000 |
|
$20,000 |
|
Works delayed |
Tathra Bermagui Rd, rock scour protection |
$30,000 |
|
$30,000 |
|
Works delayed |
Tathra Bermagui Rd, culvert, rock scour protection |
$10,000 |
|
$10,000 |
|
Works delayed |
ROADS URBAN SEALED LOCAL |
|||||
Nelson St Pavement Stabilisation |
$85,560 |
|
$85,560 |
|
Works delayed |
Poplar Ave, culvert |
$30,000 |
|
|
$30,000 |
Reserves Asset Management |
Flinders Street (851-2) ch:120 |
$14,490 |
|
|
$14,490 |
Reserves Asset Management |
ROADS URBAN SEALED REGIONAL |
|||||
Imlay St Crossing |
$12,000 |
$12,000 |
|
|
Works delayed |
SEWER SERVICES |
|||||
Tura STP sludge lagoon pipeline redirection |
$51,000 |
$51,000 |
|
|
Works delayed |
Total Revotes - Capital |
$408,050 |
$83,000 |
$205,560 |
$119,490 |
|
Legal /Policy
Council is required to approve expenditure and vote money to cover expenditure under clause 211 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005.
Impacts on Strategic/Operational/Asset Management Plan/Risk
CSP: 6.12: Our Council is financially sustainable and services and facilities meet community need
DP: 6.12.5: Improve the provision of corporate financial services
OP: 6.12.5.2 - Prioritise actions of Finance Improvement Plan and deliver agreed milestones
Environmental / Sustainability
There are some environmental and sustainability impacts associated with the grant funded projects that are included in the recommendations of this report.
Economic
There are no negative economic impacts associated with the grant funded programs that are included in the recommendations of this report.
Risk
The recommendations of this report allow Council to manage budget expenditure across the long-term financial plan period. The corresponding impact may be the delivery of planned programs and projects documented in the FY2021 Operational Plan.
Social / Cultural
There will be positive social benefits in Council being able to complete the works allocated budget in 2021 and not finished by the end of Financial Year. There may be impacts on the FY2022 planned projects if they are delayed while the previous year’s works are completed.
Attachments